Searching \ for '[PIC] MPLAB X 1.0 released' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/languages.htm?key=mplab
Search entire site for: 'MPLAB X 1.0 released'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[PIC] MPLAB X 1.0 released'
2011\12\17@173353 by Matt Bennett

flavicon
face
MPLAB X V1.0 has been announced on the forums:
<http://www.microchip.com/forums/m607785.aspx>

The page you can download it from, for the moment, still has "Beta" in the
title, but this name is being kept around to prevent links from breaking
(for the time being). The "official" big, splashy announcement (press
releases and all that) will be done in January.

Matt Bennett
Just outside of Austin, TX
30.51,-97.91

The views I express are my own, not that of my employer, a large
multinational corporation that you are familiar with

2011\12\17@204948 by V G

picon face
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Matt Bennett <spam_OUTmattpiclistTakeThisOuTspamhazmat.com> wrote:
> MPLAB X V1.0 has been announced on the forums:
> <http://www.microchip.com/forums/m607785.aspx>
>
> The page you can download it from, for the moment, still has "Beta" in the
> title, but this name is being kept around to prevent links from breaking
> (for the time being). The "official" big, splashy announcement (press
> releases and all that) will be done in January.

Very nice

2011\12\18@062347 by Tamas Rudnai

face picon face
Great news! It is really good to see a "native" MPLAB on my Mac :-)

I cannot seem to find the Logic Analyzer in the View nor the Debugger menu
when simulating a code with MPSIM. Where did they put that?

Thanks,
Tamas


On 17 December 2011 22:33, Matt Bennett <.....mattpiclistKILLspamspam@spam@hazmat.com> wrote:

{Quote hidden}

>

2011\12\18@064504 by Jan-Erik Soderholm

face picon face
Review the readme docs, not all MPLAB-8 features seems to be
fully supported, the simulator(s) are seems to be part of this.

There is no trace of "logic analyzer" i any files in the install dir.



Tamas Rudnai wrote 2011-12-18 12:23:
{Quote hidden}

>> -

2011\12\18@082611 by Tamas Rudnai

face picon face
I see, thanks very much.

Tamas


On 18 December 2011 11:45, Jan-Erik Soderholm
<.....jan-erik.soderholmKILLspamspam.....telia.com>wrote:

{Quote hidden}

2011\12\18@091127 by Jan-Erik Soderholm

face picon face
I just opened an MPLAB-8 workspace file in "X" and it
was no major problem. X creates a new subdirectory with
all X-specific stuff and do not tuch any "8" specific files.

One thing that was not converted correctly was the
"ignore case" setting in MPASM. Easy to re-check...

When entering a map filename (why isn't the main source file name
also the default MAP file name ?) I had a few crashes in a "rm"
tool ("remove", aka "delete") before the project rebuilt cleanly.

It was weird, "Build" complained that it could not rebuild P16F690.INC
and "Clean and Build" crashed a few times. Then suddenly it built OK.
I don't know why, it *could* have been when I changed the map filename
from "abc" to "abc.map") .

But apart from that it worked nicely. :-)

And it *does* have PICkit2 support now, the beta's didn't, right ?

Jan-Erik.








Tamas Rudnai wrote 2011-12-18 14:26:
{Quote hidden}

2011\12\18@094737 by Peter Onion

flavicon
face
On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 15:11 +0100, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:


>
> And it *does* have PICkit2 support now, the beta's didn't, right ?
>
The last beta certainly had PICkit2 support but the ICD2 support present
in earlier betas was removed.  Maybe you are mixing up the two "2s" ?

PeterO

2011\12\18@100935 by John Coppens

flavicon
face
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:33:43 -0600 (CST)
"Matt Bennett" <KILLspammattpiclistKILLspamspamhazmat.com> wrote:

>
> MPLAB X V1.0 has been announced on the forums:
> <http://www.microchip.com/forums/m607785.aspx>

I selected Linux 32/64, clicked on download, and get the dialog:

"Please select the software tools by clicking on the selection box"

This is with Firefox 8.0... Am I doing something wrong here?

Joh

2011\12\18@101423 by mcd

flavicon
face
Peter Onion said:

> the ICD2 support present in earlier betas was removed

Not only that, but the release notes indicate that ICD2 will not be
supported in the future.  Certainly discouraging.

I haven't been following all that closely, although I did tinker with
betas 6 and 7.  Was there any indication as to why?


--McD

2011\12\18@102911 by M.L.

flavicon
face

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 10:25 AM,  <RemoveMEmcdTakeThisOuTspamis-sixsigma.com> wrote:
> Not only that, but the release notes indicate that ICD2 will not be
> supported in the future.  Certainly discouraging.
>
> I haven't been following all that closely, although I did tinker with
> betas 6 and 7.  Was there any indication as to why?
>
>
> --McD


The ICD2 has been "not recommended" for a couple years now. If not
officially, then by the fact that it never really worked right. I can
still recall MPLAB crashing all the time with ICD2.
--
Martin K.

2011\12\18@103515 by John Coppens

flavicon
face
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 12:09:30 -0300
John Coppens <spamBeGonejohnspamBeGonespamjcoppens.com> wrote:

> "Please select the software tools by clicking on the selection box"

That was stupid of me. The white *check boxes* on black background gave
me the impression of being text bullets...

Sorry for the noise.

Joh

2011\12\18@111155 by Jan-Erik Soderholm

face picon face


Peter Onion wrote 2011-12-18 15:47:
> On Sun, 2011-12-18 at 15:11 +0100, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
>
>
>>
>> And it *does* have PICkit2 support now, the beta's didn't, right ?
>>
>
> The last beta certainly had PICkit2 support but the ICD2 support present
> in earlier betas was removed.  Maybe you are mixing up the two "2s" ?
>
> PeterO
>

No, PICkit2.

I seem to remember that the PICkit3 support came earlier then
PICkit2 support. Nevertheless, next thing to do is to hook
up my PICkit2..

2011\12\18@175650 by Matt Bennett

flavicon
face
On Sun, December 18, 2011 9:25 am, TakeThisOuTmcdEraseMEspamspam_OUTis-sixsigma.com wrote:
> Peter Onion said:
>
>> the ICD2 support present in earlier betas was removed
>
> Not only that, but the release notes indicate that ICD2 will not be
> supported in the future.  Certainly discouraging.
>
> I haven't been following all that closely, although I did tinker with
> betas 6 and 7.  Was there any indication as to why?

The ICD2 is an old design, there are hardware limitations that make the
ICD2 a lot less flexible than newer programmers, particularly in relation
to VPP (programming voltage), that make it difficult to make it work
consistently with newer parts.

Matt Bennett
Just outside of Austin, TX
30.51,-97.91

The views I express are my own, not that of my employer, a large
multinational corporation that you are familiar with

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2011 , 2012 only
- Today
- New search...