Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[PIC]:FTDI FT245BM bus sharing?'
2003\07\21@085115
by
?Graham=20North?=
Has anyone had success using the FT245BM?
I am trying to use it in a prototype design, but am wanting to share the data bus with other peripherals (e.g. LCD). I have the device self powered as per the user guide. The problem I can see is that as soon as the USB cable is plugged in, the chip will come out of reset and its data bus pins will not be tristated, and I won't be able to share the data bus with any other device.
Thanks
Graham
---------------------------------
Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo!Messenger
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
2003\07\21@092523
by
Peter Moreton
Graham, I had the same dilemma; wanted to put a FT245 onto the PSP bus
of a PIC, and also run a parallel ADC onto the PSP as well. Reading the
datasheets, I could not convince myself that bus contention problems
would not occur, and ended up putting the parts onto separate busses. I
suggest an email to FTDI's product support might be worthwhile, and I'd
be interested to hear what they say.
Regards, Peter Moreton
{Original Message removed}
2003\07\21@100354
by
?Graham=20North?=
Hi Peter,
I have sent their support department two emails on the subject with no reply :-(
I'm starting to think the same as you.
Graham
Peter Moreton <spam_OUTpeterTakeThisOuT
RIL.ORG.UK> wrote:
Graham, I had the same dilemma; wanted to put a FT245 onto the PSP bus
of a PIC, and also run a parallel ADC onto the PSP as well. Reading the
datasheets, I could not convince myself that bus contention problems
would not occur, and ended up putting the parts onto separate busses. I
suggest an email to FTDI's product support might be worthwhile, and I'd
be interested to hear what they say.
Regards, Peter Moreton
{Original Message removed}
2003\07\21@104504
by
Ken Pergola
Hi Graham,
The FT245xM's bus is *only active* when RD# is asserted and is tristated
otherwise.
When you want to share the bus, you must make sure RD# is not asserted.
Best regards,
Ken Pergola
{Original Message removed}
2003\07\22@071234
by
?Graham=20North?=
Ken, have you successfully used this chip as you describe?
Thanks
Graham
Ken Pergola <.....no_spamKILLspam
@spam@LOCALNET.COM> wrote:
Hi Graham,
The FT245xM's bus is *only active* when RD# is asserted and is tristated
otherwise.
When you want to share the bus, you must make sure RD# is not asserted.
Best regards,
Ken Pergola
{Original Message removed}
2003\07\22@151340
by
Ken Pergola
Hi Graham,
How are you coming to the determination that the bus is not tri-stated?
Don't forget that the data bus and control signals have internal pullups (I
believe FTDI told me that value is approximately 200K ohms).
I'm finding out they are tri-stated when RD# is not asserted (+5V with
respect to ground). If I short a data line to ground (while RD# is not
asserted) I'm measuring 0.028 mA which confirms that it is tri-stated and
support's FTDI claim about the 200K ohm pullups.
Regarding your question about sharing the bus:
I haven't yet the need to share the bus so I have not tried it personally --
the information I posted was information given to me by FTDI.
Please give us some more details and let us know what you find out.
Best regards,
Ken Pergola
{Original Message removed}
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2003
, 2004 only
- Today
- New search...