Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[PIC]: MPASM Macro help Please'
2003\03\24@075948
by
Hazelwood Lyle
Greetings all,
I posted this question last night, but it never showed up on either of my accounts.
Please excuse me if you get it twice.
I'm just learning to write macros, and I have an ambitious one that is working, but not quite the
way I'd like.
If I invoke the macro only once, all is well. But
if I use it twice (or more), I get the following error:
: Address label duplicated or different in second pass
I understand the cause, but I'm wondering if there's a
way I can include branches to labels within a macro
without resorting to counting instructions and using
BRA $+xx. (which works for now, but makes editing a pain)
I'd be grateful for any suggestions.
Thanks,
Lyle Hazelwood
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
2003\03\24@082343
by
Quentin
2003\03\24@084458
by
Olin Lathrop
> Address label duplicated or different in second pass
Use the LOCAL directive to declare labels that will be unique to each
macro invocation. See STD.INS.ASPIC at http://www.embedinc.com/pic for
lots of macro examples.
*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
2003\03\24@084913
by
Hazelwood Lyle
Thanks Quentin, works like a charm.
I had seen the LOCAL option for variables
local to a macro, I didn't realize that it
could be applied to labels as well.
Lyle
{Original Message removed}
2003\03\26@023540
by
Lyle Hazelwood
Greetings all,
I'm trying to get a grip on macros, with an (overly) ambitious first
project.
macro is working well if only invoked from one place in the source.
If I invoke it from two places, the labels used inside the macro generate
an error,
: Address label duplicated or different in second pass
I understand the cause, but is there some way other than doing braches
by literal value instead of labels? I'd rather not count instructions for
each
conditional branch.
Any suggestions are appreciated.
Lyle Hazelwood
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email .....listservKILLspam
@spam@mitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
2003\03\26@073840
by
Olin Lathrop
> I'm trying to get a grip on macros, with an (overly) ambitious first
> project.
>
> macro is working well if only invoked from one place in the source.
> If I invoke it from two places, the labels used inside the macro
> generate an error,
>> Address label duplicated or different in second pass
This exact question was answered just a day or two ago.
Use the LOCAL directive. For lots of macro examples, see STD.INS.ASPIC at
http://www.embedinc.com/pic.
*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv
KILLspammitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
2003\03\26@074500
by
Hazelwood Lyle
Olin,
Thanks for the help (again).
The message you replied to was posted by me on Sunday evening.
By Monday morning, I had not yet seen the message from either
of my PICLIST accounts, so I reposted it from work, with a comment
at the beginning that the original post never made it through.
I noticed this morning, as you did, that the original "lost"
message finally made it through! If you check the header,
you'll see that it was sent Sunday night.
In any case, thanks for the help (twice!) and it's working great now.
Lyle
{Original Message removed}
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2003
, 2004 only
- Today
- New search...