Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[PIC]: EEPROM / 16F877'
2000\11\13@025904
by
Michael Rigby-Jones
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mario A. Amaral [SMTP:spam_OUTmarioamaralTakeThisOuT
SOFTONE.COM.BR]
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 2:53 AM
> To: .....PICLISTKILLspam
@spam@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: EEPROM / 16F877
>
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how to do a initialization of the eeprom / 16F877 ?
>
> For the 16F84 I use:
>
> ORG 0X2100
> DE .10, .14, .20 ...
>
> but for 16F877 this not work.
>
> Mario
>
This method works fine for me using an 877, but I am doing this through
HiTech C, and I use db rather than de.
Mike
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
"[PIC]:","[SX]:","[AVR]:" =uP ONLY! "[EE]:","[OT]:" =Other "[BUY]:","[AD]:" =Ads
2000\11\13@130142
by
Mario A. Amaral
Hello Kurt,
Thanks for the answer, but now is show the message.
Warning[220] C:\MPLAB\PROGRAMS\SEQ8C\SEQ8C.ASM 175 : Address exceeds maximum
range for this processor.
Mario
{Original Message removed}
2000\11\13@200115
by
o-8859-1?Q?K=FCbek_Tony?=
Hi,
Mario wrote:
>Does anyone know how to do a initialization of the eeprom / 16F877 ?
>
>For the 16F84 I use:
>
> ORG 0X2100
> DE .10, .14, .20 ...
>
>but for 16F877 this not work.
It seems ok, I use the snippet below in a running s/w
the only difference i see is the DE vs. DW but that should be ok.
ORG 0x2100 ; 256 bytes of eeram
DW 0x31
DW 0x80 ; etc..
So it should work, how about the WREN ?
/tony
Tony Kübek, Flintab AB
²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²
E-mail: tony.kubek
KILLspamflintab.com
²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²²
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000
, 2001 only
- Today
- New search...