Searching \ for '[PIC]: Driving a speaker?' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/ios.htm?key=speaker
Search entire site for: 'Driving a speaker?'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[PIC]: Driving a speaker?'
2003\11\26@142257 by WH Tan

flavicon
face
In Microchip application notes AN529, it show an example of industrial
clock.

A speaker was wiring to RA0 of PIC16C57. As a typical speaker have an
impedence of 8-ohm. I am wondering are I/Os of 16C57 could sufficiently
drive the speaker. Am I missing anything?

Thanks in advance.

WH Tan

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email spam_OUTlistservTakeThisOuTspammitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

2003\11\26@162216 by Bob Axtell

face picon face
A typical speaker DOES have an 8-ohm impedance. However, 100-ohm speakers
are readily available, and at 5V/25ma have a very useable volume. Normally that
is what is meant.

I normally drive the speaker through a 220uF electrolytic cap.

--Bob

At 12:18 PM 11/26/2003, you wrote:
{Quote hidden}

--------------
Bob Axtell
PIC Hardware & Firmware Dev
Tucson, AZ
1-520-219-2363
"I lose some on each sale but make it up in volume."

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservspamKILLspammitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

2003\11\27@055324 by egnascimento

flavicon
face
It is impossible.
Try to use a LM386 between the PIC and the speaker!

I hope this helped,
Eduardo Garcia

{Original Message removed}

2003\11\27@071131 by Michael J. Pawlowsky

flavicon
face
I do it through a 10uF cap.

PIC + ------- +cap- ---------+ speaker - ------- gnd

http://microengineeringlabs.com/resources/pbpmanual/images/speaker.gif


>> In Microchip application notes AN529, it show an example of industrial
>> clock.
>>
>> A speaker was wiring to RA0 of PIC16C57. As a typical speaker have an
>> impedence of 8-ohm. I am wondering are I/Os of 16C57 could sufficiently
>> drive the speaker. Am I missing anything?

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
.....piclist-unsubscribe-requestKILLspamspam.....mitvma.mit.edu

2003\11\27@105115 by egnascimento
flavicon
face
It is a 8 ohm impedance speaker?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael J. Pawlowsky" <EraseMEmikejpspam_OUTspamTakeThisOuTVIDEOTRON.CA>
To: <PICLISTspamspam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 10:04 AM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


{Quote hidden}

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 06/11/03

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
KILLspampiclist-unsubscribe-requestKILLspamspammitvma.mit.edu

2003\11\27@153046 by Peter L. Peres

picon face
>A speaker was wiring to RA0 of PIC16C57. As a typical speaker have an
>impedence of 8-ohm. I am wondering are I/Os of 16C57 could sufficiently
>drive the speaker. Am I missing anything?

It is a piezo speaker. Use a 220Ohm resistor in series with it if you use
read-modify-write instructions on this port.

Peter

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
RemoveMEpiclist-unsubscribe-requestTakeThisOuTspammitvma.mit.edu

2003\11\27@215308 by Richard Graziano

picon face
The LM384 has been around a long time and very simple to implement.  I have
even breadborded it successfully with wire wrap on 100 mil perf board.
Front end it with a 50k pot and capacitively couple the output to the
speaker.

{Original Message removed}

2003\11\27@234058 by William Chops Westfield

face picon face
On Thursday, Nov 27, 2003, at 02:50 US/Pacific,
spamBeGoneegnascimentospamBeGonespamYAHOO.COM.BR wrote:

> It is impossible.

That seems unlikely.  See below...

> Try to use a LM386 between the PIC and the speaker!

An actual audio amplifier IC is surely overkill for a digital square
wave.
At worst, you can get by with a transistor.
You can almost certainly get by with a resistor that limits current to
the maximum that the pic pin is supposed to deliver (assume 0 ohms DC
resistance for the speaker and you'll be safe.)

It does bring up an interesting question, though.  To what extent IS it
safe to drive a 0-ohm load from a PIC pin?  On the one hand, you have
those maximum current output specs (25mA) from the datasheet.  On the
other hand, you have the internal circuitry, which being cmos likely
provides some sort of inherent current limiting, and perhaps some sort
of intentional short-circuit protection in the I/O circuitry as well.
Not to mention loads of circuits that apparently work OK that connect
everything from LEDs to speakers directly between IO pins and power
supply without any additional current limiting...

BillW

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
TakeThisOuTpiclist-unsubscribe-requestEraseMEspamspam_OUTmitvma.mit.edu

2003\11\28@000907 by D. Yates

flavicon
face
If you do drive it straight from the pin it might be a good idea to isolate it in some way.  I'm not sure what sort of inductive kickback a speaker would generate from a square-wave, but I doubt the PIC would like it if it were directly connected.  I'd put a diode in parallel with the winding just to be safe.

----------
D. Yates
RemoveMEpiclistspamTakeThisOuTnerdulator.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------
-->> Add WEB ACCESS to your POP email accounts with
-->> FREE Perl CGI scripts! Download today! http://www.adjeweb.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\28@101720 by Herbert Graf

flavicon
face
> If you do drive it straight from the pin it might be a good idea to
> isolate it in some way.  I'm not sure what sort of inductive kickback
> a speaker would generate from a square-wave, but I doubt the PIC
> would like it if it were directly connected.  I'd put a diode in
> parallel with the winding just to be safe.

       I'd also recommend a cap to ac couple the speaker, don't want the PIC pin
high for a long time connected to an 8ohm load to ground. TTYL

----------------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\28@131232 by gtyler

flavicon
face
You really want to load the pic output with a diode?

George

----- Original Message -----
From: "Herbert Graf" <mailinglistEraseMEspam.....FARCITE.NET>
To: <EraseMEPICLISTspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


> > If you do drive it straight from the pin it might be a good idea to
> > isolate it in some way.  I'm not sure what sort of inductive kickback
> > a speaker would generate from a square-wave, but I doubt the PIC
> > would like it if it were directly connected.  I'd put a diode in
> > parallel with the winding just to be safe.
>
>         I'd also recommend a cap to ac couple the speaker, don't want the
PIC pin
{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\28@132308 by Herbert Graf

flavicon
face
> > > If you do drive it straight from the pin it might be a good idea to
> > > isolate it in some way.  I'm not sure what sort of inductive kickback
> > > a speaker would generate from a square-wave, but I doubt the PIC
> > > would like it if it were directly connected.  I'd put a diode in
> > > parallel with the winding just to be safe.
> >
> >         I'd also recommend a cap to ac couple the speaker,
> don't want the
> PIC pin
> > high for a long time connected to an 8ohm load to ground. TTYL
>
>
> You really want to load the pic output with a diode?
>
> George

       No, and that wasn't suggested. The diode is there to prevent the inductive
kickback from hitting the PIC pin. I don't see how you can say you are
"loading" the PIC pin with the diode, the diode only conducts when the
speaker is turned off, and then only conducts current due to the attempt to
change the current flowing through the speaker quickly. It is a similar
effect to turning off a relay. TTYL

----------------------------------
Herbert's PIC Stuff:
http://repatch.dyndns.org:8383/pic_stuff/

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\28@134004 by Sergio Masci

picon face
----- Original Message -----
From: Herbert Graf <RemoveMEmailinglistEraseMEspamEraseMEFARCITE.NET>
To: <RemoveMEPICLISTspam_OUTspamKILLspamMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


{Quote hidden}

inductive
> kickback from hitting the PIC pin. I don't see how you can say you are
> "loading" the PIC pin with the diode, the diode only conducts when the
> speaker is turned off, and then only conducts current due to the attempt to
> change the current flowing through the speaker quickly. It is a similar
> effect to turning off a relay. TTYL

You're both right - depends which way round the diode is.

Regards
Sergio Masci

http://www.xcprod.com/titan/XCSB - optimising structured PIC BASIC compiler

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\28@151942 by gtyler

flavicon
face
This could be true if it is an open drain output, otherwise it does not
matter which way the diode is, in one direction the diode will short the
output, also an isolating capacitor does not solve it either. While I have
seen PICs work like this I doubt if it is good practice.Rather drive a
transistor and use that to drive the speaker.

George

> > > You really want to load the pic output with a diode?
> > >
> > > George
> >
> >         No, and that wasn't suggested. The diode is there to prevent the
> inductive
> > kickback from hitting the PIC pin. I don't see how you can say you are
> > "loading" the PIC pin with the diode, the diode only conducts when the
> > speaker is turned off, and then only conducts current due to the attempt
to
> > change the current flowing through the speaker quickly. It is a similar
> > effect to turning off a relay. TTYL
>
> You're both right - depends which way round the diode is.
>
> Regards
> Sergio Masci
>

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\28@171757 by Mike

picon face
On 28 Nov 2003 at 22:15, gtyler wrote:


> This could be true if it is an open drain output, otherwise it does not
> matter which way the diode is,

Yes it does. It's called a inductive kick-back and it doesn't care if its an open-drain or
not. It will attempt to sent a high-current spike in the other direction. I wouldn't count
on the pull-up to absorb it all either.

There's a lot of text below and by top posting, it isn't clear who or what you're replying
to.

>  in one direction the diode will short the
> output, also an isolating capacitor does not solve it either.

The cap is to protect the speaker in the event that the PIC output is inadvertently left
high.

> While I have
> seen PICs work like this I doubt if it is good practice.Rather drive a
> transistor and use that to drive the speaker.

Why would it be bad practice? It only depends on the amount of drive required. If the
PIC can drive it... as they say, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."

at 5Vp-p into 8 ohms with no cap:

Vrms = 3.53V and P = 1.56 W avg

with cap and assuming a reasonable square wave at the speaker, neglecting cap
loss:

Vrms = 2.5V and P = 781mW avg.

NOTE: square wave in this context implies 50% DC, any thing else is a pulse or
rectangular wave except for 0% and 100% DC

Take 781mW (with cap, which is smart, not for the speakers sake in this case, but
that of the PIC) and you get:

Irms = sqrt(Pave/R) = 312 mA rms

Ip = 441mA

So much for the 8 ohm speaker with no driver transistor. But that removes the
abiguity of the technical term "doubt" used above. Good guess, though ;-)

BRs,
Mike
{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\11\29@010435 by Wouter van Ooijen

face picon face
> Yes it does. It's called a inductive kick-back and it doesn't
> care if its an open-drain or
> not. It will attempt to sent a high-current spike in the
> other direction.

Actually the coil (like any coil) tries to maintain the same *current*,
which (depending on the resistance encountered) might force it to
'generate' a large voltage, which might cause death for an unfortuanate
semiconductor that was trying to be a high resistance.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: http://www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\11\29@013420 by Mike

picon face
On 29 Nov 2003 at 7:03, Wouter van Ooijen wrote:


> > Yes it does. It's called a inductive kick-back and it doesn't
> > care if its an open-drain or
> > not. It will attempt to sent a high-current spike in the
> > other direction.
>
> Actually the coil (like any coil) tries to maintain the same *current*,
> which (depending on the resistance encountered) might force it to
> 'generate' a large voltage, which might cause death for an unfortuanate
> semiconductor that was trying to be a high resistance.
>
> Wouter van Ooijen

Of course. Sorry for the gaffe. A coil doesn't like current changes and the protection
diode switches on the voltage, not the current. But given a path, it'll end up as a
current spike :-)

BRs
Mike

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\11\29@022513 by gtyler

flavicon
face
What I mean is if it is an open drain and you connect the diode one way it
will work as intended, but if it is not an open drain then no matter which
way you fit the diode it shorts the output when it is driving either
positive or negative.

George

{Original Message removed}

2003\11\29@032027 by gtyler

flavicon
face
Good way of describing it!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wouter van Ooijen" <RemoveMEwouterTakeThisOuTspamspamVOTI.NL>
To: <EraseMEPICLISTspamspamspamBeGoneMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\11\29@060200 by Mike

picon face
On 29 Nov 2003 at 9:02, gtyler wrote:


> What I mean is if it is an open drain and you connect the diode one way it
> will work as intended, but if it is not an open drain then no matter which
> way you fit the diode it shorts the output when it is driving either
> positive or negative.
>
> George

That would be true if you can show me a PIC that drives negative, If you use the
speaker as a pullup, it's just like driving a relay. Use a stinkin' diode.

OTOH, think about all the 555 circuits driving speakers. Ever see a 555 tone
generator, warbler, whatever? Ever see even a diode on the output of one of those? I
don't recall seeing one. Turn up the volume of your stereo until it clips. You're more
likely to blow your speakers.

If you've been paying attention, I showed that a PIC ain't gonna like drivin' an 8 ohm
speaker and I plugged in 32 ohms and that's too much. So start thinking about an
output amp like the emitter follower I think someone mentioned. I've seen enough
tone generators with square wave outs and no diodes. One that comes to mind is my
line finder. It's just a two tone CMOS oscillator and an "inductive amplifier" they call it
which is the $20 way of saying LM386 op-amp. No diodes across that speaker,
either.

Mike
>
> {Original Message removed}

2003\11\29@104416 by gtyler

flavicon
face
Negative direction, ie towards 0V.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike" <RemoveMEmike.fordKILLspamspamEARTHLINK.NET>
To: <PICLISTSTOPspamspamspam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 1:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


> On 29 Nov 2003 at 9:02, gtyler wrote:
>
>
> > What I mean is if it is an open drain and you connect the diode one way
it
> > will work as intended, but if it is not an open drain then no matter
which
> > way you fit the diode it shorts the output when it is driving either
> > positive or negative.
> >
> > George
>
> That would be true if you can show me a PIC that drives negative, If you
use the
> speaker as a pullup, it's just like driving a relay. Use a stinkin' diode.
>
> OTOH, think about all the 555 circuits driving speakers. Ever see a 555
tone
> generator, warbler, whatever? Ever see even a diode on the output of one
of those? I
> don't recall seeing one. Turn up the volume of your stereo until it clips.
You're more
> likely to blow your speakers.
>
> If you've been paying attention, I showed that a PIC ain't gonna like
drivin' an 8 ohm
> speaker and I plugged in 32 ohms and that's too much. So start thinking
about an
> output amp like the emitter follower I think someone mentioned. I've seen
enough
> tone generators with square wave outs and no diodes. One that comes to
mind is my
> line finder. It's just a two tone CMOS oscillator and an "inductive
amplifier" they call it
> which is the $20 way of saying LM386 op-amp. No diodes across that
speaker,
{Quote hidden}

not
> > > > matter which way the diode is,
> > >
> > > Yes it does. It's called a inductive kick-back and it doesn't care if
its
> > an open-drain or
> > > not. It will attempt to sent a high-current spike in the other
direction.
> > I wouldn't count
> > > on the pull-up to absorb it all either.
> > >
> > > There's a lot of text below and by top posting, it isn't clear who or
what
{Quote hidden}

neglecting
> > cap
> > > loss:
> > >
> > > Vrms = 2.5V and P = 781mW avg.
> > >
> > > NOTE: square wave in this context implies 50% DC, any thing else is a
> > pulse or
> > > rectangular wave except for 0% and 100% DC
> > >
> > > Take 781mW (with cap, which is smart, not for the speakers sake in
this
> > case, but
> > > that of the PIC) and you get:
> > >
> > > Irms = sqrt(Pave/R) = 312 mA rms
> > >
> > > Ip = 441mA
> > >
> > > So much for the 8 ohm speaker with no driver transistor. But that
removes
> > the
> > > abiguity of the technical term "doubt" used above. Good guess, though
;-)
{Quote hidden}

prevent
> > the
> > > > > inductive
> > > > > > kickback from hitting the PIC pin. I don't see how you can say
you
> > are
> > > > > > "loading" the PIC pin with the diode, the diode only conducts
when
{Quote hidden}

topic:
> > > > [PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other
[BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
{Quote hidden}

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\11\29@153310 by Olin Lathrop

face picon face
This is getting rediculous again.  Your message contained 1 line of new
content and 176 lines of remnants from at least 7 previous messages,
including numerous irrelevant "signatures" and 21 lines of completely
content free old footers.

To make matters worse, your reply was put at the top out of context so it's
not even obvious what it was in reply to.  Are you "top posters" too dumb to
see that it makes a message harder to read, or too arrogant to care?

It is important to provide the context for a reply, but that rarely requires
duplicating the entire original message.  At the least you could trim the
footer automatically added by the PIClist server, of which there were 4 in
your message.


gtyler wrote:
> Negative direction, ie towards 0V.
>
>
> {Original Message removed}

2003\11\29@154804 by Steve Smith

flavicon
face
Did u realize that the the 198 lines you have criticized have been
resent by your mailer (so much for bandwidth limitation)
Steve

{Original Message removed}

2003\11\29@155216 by Colin Constant

picon face
Not sure.

>To make matters worse, your reply was put at the top out of context so it's
>not even obvious what it was in reply to.  Are you "top posters" too dumb
>to
>see that it makes a message harder to read, or too arrogant to care?
>
>It is important to provide the context for a reply, but that rarely
>requires
>duplicating the entire original message.  At the least you could trim the
>footer automatically added by the PIClist server, of which there were 4 in
>your message.

There are eight levels of response in your message. Nine now, I guess.
Sorry.

Colin
>
>
>gtyler wrote:
> > Negative direction, ie towards 0V.
> >
> >
> > {Original Message removed}

2003\11\29@163021 by Brian Clewer

flavicon
face
Olin Lathrop wrote:

>To make matters worse, your reply was put at the top out of context so it's
>not even obvious what it was in reply to.  Are you "top posters" too dumb
to
>see that it makes a message harder to read, or too arrogant to care?

Is there any way to get MS outlook to put in the '>' AND have it reply at
the footer of the msg?  I use outlook, and it seems many others do here too.
I think this is part of the problem.  Whilst I agree with Olin, putting in
the '>' on every line manually is not ideal, so it gets left as is most of
the time.

Brian.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\11\29@192431 by Richard Graziano

picon face
If the originator sends me an e-mail, I will send back a solution.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Constant" <EraseMEcolinpiclistspamEraseMEHOTMAIL.COM>
To: <@spam@PICLIST@spam@spamspam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


> Not sure.
>
> >To make matters worse, your reply was put at the top out of context so
it's
> >not even obvious what it was in reply to.  Are you "top posters" too dumb
> >to
> >see that it makes a message harder to read, or too arrogant to care?
> >
> >It is important to provide the context for a reply, but that rarely
> >requires
> >duplicating the entire original message.  At the least you could trim the
> >footer automatically added by the PIClist server, of which there were 4
in
{Quote hidden}

http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca
>
> --
> http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
> (like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\11\30@011623 by gtyler

flavicon
face
Sorry, probably "too dumb to see that it makes a message harder to read".
When you hit the reply button it automatically puts the cursor at the top of
the reply, so I thought that was the standard way of doing it. I did think
about it, but I see other people doing it both ways.You want the reply at
the bottom? no problem,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Olin Lathrop" <.....olin_piclistspamRemoveMEEMBEDINC.COM>
To: <RemoveMEPICLISTspamspamBeGoneMITVMA.MIT.EDU>
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 10:32 PM
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Driving a speaker?


> This is getting rediculous again.  Your message contained 1 line of new

I will do it like that in future.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2003\11\30@013320 by D. Yates

flavicon
face
Hey I really don't mind the "176 lines of remnants from previous messages" so much.  In fact, I really like it since it helps refresh my memory about what was last posted on the subject.  But my memory isn't so far gone that I can't follow a quippy one-liner on a topic I've been following, and I'm (usually) not so lazy as to not bother reading up on a topic in which I might post.  As for the signatures, it's always nice to see who says what.  What really gets my goat is other people making up arbitrary rules about what an ideal post looks like.  
----------
D. Yates
spamBeGonepiclist@spam@spamspam_OUTnerdulator.net


---{Original Message removed}

2003\11\30@025407 by William Chops Westfield

face picon face
On Saturday, Nov 29, 2003, at 22:14 US/Pacific, gtyler wrote:

> Sorry, probably "too dumb to see that it makes a message harder to
> read".

Well, there are assorted reasons to quote the original message(s), and
the quoting style really should change depending on the reasons.  It's
not necessary to quote at all, if your text stands alone...

> When you hit the reply button it automatically puts the cursor at the
> top of
> the reply, so I thought that was the standard way of doing it. I did
> think
> about it, but I see other people doing it both ways.

There's no standard.

> You want the reply at the bottom? no problem,

Ideally, *I* think you should edit the quoted text down to the salient
points you are responding to, and intersperse your comments with the
quoted text that is most appropriate, as I've tried to do here.  yes,
it's more work, but it's better for the readers.  One writer doing a
bit more work makes things a lot easier (potentially, anyway) a couple
thousand readers...

BillW

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2003\11\30@030441 by Russell McMahon

face
flavicon
face
>
..............What really gets my goat is
other people making up arbitrary rules about what an ideal post looks
like.
>

There was some merit in the original complaint - but it risks being dumbly
arrogant to use the terms dumb & arrogant :-). More importantly, it almost
ensures that the recipient will be so annoyed that the intended (quite
valuable) message will be lost. Try & note the valulable points in the
message while ignoring the abuse.

What the complainant was intending to communicate was

-  if responses follow what is being responded to then most people find it
easier to follow (and I agree in most cases) and

- minimising information free content is liable to make the list a nicer
place for all.

I agree that consciously trimming out extraneous material is meritorious. I
sometimes leave much of a prior post in place but if I do it is (almost
always) because I think it adds to the overall information content. I note
(not just on this list) that some people often make little or no effort to
trim posts they are responding to.

The comment on the multiple footers is worth noting. Unlike junk DNA (which
they vaguely resemble) they really do seem to have no functionality and
added, in this case, about 1 MB to the bandwidth of the net. If we could
trim this much bandwidth from the average PIClist message we would deload
the MITS server by about 50 gigabyte per year. The net has broad shoulders
but if everyone treated it as a finite resource (little hope :-( ) it would
work more nicely for all of us. There are in fact etiquette rules, some
unspoken and some embalmed in the PICList faq, which suggest or demand the
minimisation of bandwidth. Some poor souls (hopefully a diminishing
percentage) have low bandwidth lines and/or dial up connections and such
suffer disproportionately from largely regurgitated content.

Such unfortunates may now curse me (gently please) for the low information
content of this post.



           Russell McMahon

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2003\11\30@084110 by Olin Lathrop

face picon face
> Is there any way to get MS outlook to put in the '>' AND have it
> reply at the footer of the msg?  I use outlook, and it seems many
> others do here too. I think this is part of the problem.  Whilst I
> agree with Olin, putting in the '>' on every line manually is not
> ideal, so it gets left as is most of the time.

I use Outlook Express, and this is easily set up.  The "> " you see above
were placed there automatically by OE.  In OE, go to TOOLS > OPTIONS > SEND
and make sure you always send everything as PLAIN TEXT.  Then go to PLAIN
TEXT SETTINGS.  Make sure you select MIME > NONE for encoding type.  Now you
can also see where you select how replied-to text is to be "indented".  Also
make sure your wrap columns are set to something from 72 to 80.


*****************************************************************
Embed Inc, embedded system specialists in Littleton Massachusetts
(978) 742-9014, http://www.embedinc.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.


'[PIC]: Driving a speaker?'
2003\12\02@085030 by Nigel Orr
flavicon
face
pic microcontroller discussion list wrote:
> Is there any way to get MS outlook to put in the '>' AND have it
> reply at the footer of the msg?  I use outlook, and it seems many
> others do here too. I think this is part of the problem.  Whilst I
> agree with Olin, putting in the '>' on every line manually is not
> ideal, so it gets left as is most of the time.

Do a web search for 'QuoteFix'.  It was suggested by someone on the
piclist, about a year ago, and I've used it since.  There are versions for
OE and Outlook.

Nigel

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
TakeThisOuTpiclist-unsubscribe-requestspamspammitvma.mit.edu

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2003 , 2004 only
- Today
- New search...