Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[PIC:] Source tracking in MPLAB (was: "Re: [PIC:] '
2004\02\19@135930
by
Andrew Warren
|
Ben Hencke <spam_OUTPICLISTTakeThisOuT
mitvma.mit.edu> wrote:
> I want the debugger to keep the code and really
> execute it, but to cursor over it as if it was either
> a function or a single instruction. The way it behaves
> now is that the run cursor doesnt get to the if, it
> goes straight into the macro code, so you cant even
> tell what you are 'if'ing.
Ben:
It's been a long time since I've used MPLAB, but I remember being
annoyed by that, and I have a vague recollection that there was a way
to keep it from happening. Maybe if you assemble with macro
expansion turned on (or off)? Try the "EXPAND" and "NOEXPAND"
directives and see if that makes a difference.
You might also try using "Step Over" instead of "Step"; perhaps it
works with macros the way it works with subroutines.
I know there's also a "track source code" checkbox in one of MPLAB's
Options dialogs, but I think it affects ALL source-code tracking, not
just tracking of macros.
-Andy
=== Andrew Warren -- .....aiwKILLspam
@spam@cypress.com
=== Principal Design Engineer
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
===
=== Opinions expressed above do not
=== necessarily represent those of
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listserv
KILLspammitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2004
, 2005 only
- Today
- New search...