Searching \ for '[PIC:] PIC/AVR PIC vs AVR (ATMEL)' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Search entire site for: 'PIC/AVR PIC vs AVR (ATMEL)'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[PIC:] PIC/AVR PIC vs AVR (ATMEL)'
2004\04\17@172317 by michael brown

picon face
Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> Jonathan Johnson wrote :
>
>> Actually I believe we came to an amendment awhile ago and
>> relocated the colon to INSIDE the brackets due to crappy
>> ol' outlook(yes I am a user myself) stripping the tags.
>
> Actualy, it's my firm believing that those problems
> ("crappy ol' outlook stripping the tags") *begun* when
> the colon was moved *inside* the brackets. I never saw that
> problem before, and I always put the colon *outside*
> of the brackets in my own posts.

Actually (;-) it all started many moons ago after MS put out some kind
of update that resulted in Outlook Express messing the tags up.

> It's my understanding that Outlook sometimes mixes up
> the "[xxx:]" tags with the normal "Re:" or "Fw:" tags and strips
> them (and leaves a single "]") to avoid multiple tags in the subject.
> When using the "[xxx]:" tags, this never happens (for me, at least).
> I have *only* seen the stripping of tags when the colon has been
> inside the brackets.

Outlook Express is the primary culprit and it happens to me all the
time, usually when replying to the original post.

> I'v still not seen any reasonable reason to move the colon
> inside the brackets and I believe my explanation above
> is pretty plausable...

I think that's because you are using Outlook and not OE.  ;-)

> I'm reading piclist using Outlook 2000 SR1, b.t.w.

Right.  ;-)

>> tag corrected ;-)
>
> I'm not sure it was... :-) :-)

I bet it was.  ;-)

michael brown

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2004\04\18@055541 by Jan-Erik Soderholm

face picon face
michael brown wrote :

> Outlook Express is the primary culprit and it happens to me all the
> time, usually when replying to the original post.

OK.
I think I understand what happens now.

The reason *I* see this problem, is that someone *else*
(using OE) has replied with a corrupted tag, not that *my*
tool  (Outlook) corrupted it...

So it's "colon inside" that is the rule then :-)

Sorry for the fuzz...

Jan-Erik.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2004\04\18@061032 by Matt Marsh

flavicon
face
On Sunday 18 April 2004 10:56, Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:
> michael brown wrote :
> > Outlook Express is the primary culprit and it happens to me all
> > the time, usually when replying to the original post.
>
> OK.
> I think I understand what happens now.
>
> The reason *I* see this problem, is that someone *else*
> (using OE) has replied with a corrupted tag, not that *my*
> tool  (Outlook) corrupted it...
>
> So it's "colon inside" that is the rule then :-)

Maybe the incorrect signature should be fixed then, to be consistant
with the website...

Matt

--
Matt N. Marsh
Email: spam_OUTmattTakeThisOuTspammattmarsh.net          Yahoo: marshmn
 Web: http://www.mattmarsh.net/  Jabber: .....mattmarshKILLspamspam@spam@jabber.org
                                    MSN: mattspamKILLspammattmarsh.net
                                    ICQ: 250467363
                                    AIM: MattMarshUK

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2004 , 2005 only
- Today
- New search...