Post by thread:[PIC:] MM5369 Substitute Won't Build Hex File (New

I have the .asm file from the "Designing For Dollars" application note number DS40160A/4_008 which will allow the 12C508A to be used to replace an MM5369. Other than the error in the main title (MHz should be Hz) this code is supposed to be functional as printed. When I import the .asm file into MPLAB 6.62 I receive the following errors. Clean: Deleting intermediary and output files. Clean: Done. Executing: "I:\Program Files\MPLAB IDE\MCHIP_Tools\mpasmwin.exe" /q /p12C508A "mm5369.asm" /l"mm5369.lst" /e"mm5369.err" Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 66 : Illegal opcode (Data.W) Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 67 : Illegal opcode (Data.W) Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 68 : Illegal opcode (Data.W) Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 69 : Illegal opcode (Data.W) Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 75 : Illegal opcode (Data.W) Warning[205] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 249 : Found directive in column 1. (END) Halting build on first failure as requested. BUILD FAILED: Mon Nov 22 13:59:19 2004 Could this be because I am trying to use the 12C508A version of the device because that is all I have? Thanks, Ed ____________________________________________

At 02:23 PM 11/22/2004 -0700, you wrote: {Quote hidden}>I have the .asm file from the "Designing For Dollars" application note >number DS40160A/4_008 which will allow the 12C508A to be used to replace >an MM5369. Other than the error in the main title (MHz should be Hz) this >code is supposed to be functional as printed. > >When I import the .asm file into MPLAB 6.62 I receive the following errors. > >Clean: Deleting intermediary and output files. >Clean: Done. >Executing: "I:\Program Files\MPLAB IDE\MCHIP_Tools\mpasmwin.exe" /q >/p12C508A "mm5369.asm" /l"mm5369.lst" /e"mm5369.err" > >Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 66 : >Illegal opcode (Data.W) > >Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 67 : >Illegal opcode (Data.W) > >Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 68 : >Illegal opcode (Data.W) > >Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 69 : >Illegal opcode (Data.W) > >Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 75 : >Illegal opcode (Data.W) > >Warning[205] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369.ASM 249 : >Found directive in column 1. (END) > >Halting build on first failure as requested. > >BUILD FAILED: Mon Nov 22 13:59:19 2004 > >Could this be because I am trying to use the 12C508A version of the device >because that is all I have? > >Thanks, >Ed No, it's because the Data.W directive is no longer supported by MPASM. If you delete the ID word section (you could use __idlocs, but it's not required) and change to using the __config directive it will assemble. It seems to run 30ppm slow for both outputs, however, if MPSIM tells the truth. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" spam_OUTspeffTakeThisOuTinterlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com ____________________________________________

No, it's because the Data.W directive is no longer supported by MPASM. >>If you delete the ID word section (you could use __idlocs, but it's not >>required) I did this: ; ID0 Data.W H'0000' ; ID1 Data.W H'0000' ; ID2 Data.W H'0000' ; ID3 Data.W H'0007' ; and the Fuses... ORG H'0FFF' _CONFIG Data.W MCLREnabled + NoCodeProtect + WDTEnabled + XTOsc ; Added underscore I got this: Warning[207] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369E.ASM 84 : Found label after column 1. (_CONFIG) This is just a warning, correct? Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369E.ASM 84 : Illegal opcode (MCLREnabled) A problem? Warning[205] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369E.ASM 258 : Found directive in column 1. (END) Another warning, Correct? Halting build on first failure as requested. BUILD FAILED: Mon Nov 22 17:08:23 2004 It seems to run 30ppm slow for both outputs, however, if MPSIM tells the truth. This isn't really a problem if you are sync'd to the 60Hz line frequency? Or, does the code have to be rewritten to correct this discrepancy? Thanks, Ed ----- Original Message ----- <Snip> ____________________________________________

At 05:21 PM 11/22/2004 -0700, you wrote: >No, it's because the Data.W directive is no longer supported by MPASM. > >>>If you delete the ID word section (you could use __idlocs, but it's not >>>required) > >I did this: > > >; ID0 Data.W H'0000' >; ID1 Data.W H'0000' >; ID2 Data.W H'0000' >; ID3 Data.W H'0007' > >; and the Fuses... > > ORG H'0FFF' > >_CONFIG Data.W MCLREnabled + NoCodeProtect + WDTEnabled + XTOsc ; Added >underscore You need a *double* underscore, as I suggested. >I got this: > >Warning[207] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369E.ASM 84 : >Found label after column 1. (_CONFIG) > >This is just a warning, correct? No. >Error[122] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369E.ASM 84 : >Illegal opcode (MCLREnabled) > >A problem? Related to above. >Warning[205] I:\ED'S\MICROCHIP INC\12C508 - 509\ASM FILES\MM5369E.ASM 258 >: Found directive in column 1. (END) > >Another warning, Correct? Yes, just indent it to make the warning go away. >Halting build on first failure as requested. >BUILD FAILED: Mon Nov 22 17:08:23 2004 > >It seems to run 30ppm slow for both outputs, however, if MPSIM tells the >truth. > >This isn't really a problem if you are sync'd to the 60Hz line frequency? >Or, does the code have to be rewritten to correct this discrepancy? Probably not, depending on the details of the application. The original chip does not have a "sync" input. >Thanks, >Ed The author probably made an off-by-one error in division routines (hey, what do you expect for free), so it's off by a total of two cycles in one 60Hz waveform (about 15ppm each). The original division ratio was chosen by the NatSemi engineers so it would be within <1.5ppm with a perfect NTSC colorburst crystal frequency. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" .....speffKILLspam@spam@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com ____________________________________________

In message <003801c4d0f2$67e41380$6401a8c0@edscomputer> "Ed Edmondson" <dredwinjrKILLspambresnan.net> wrote: > _CONFIG Data.W MCLREnabled + NoCodeProtect + WDTEnabled + XTOsc ; Added > underscore Try this: __CONFIG MCLREnabled + NoCodeProtect + WDTEnabled + XTOsc Later, -- Phil. | Acorn Risc PC600 Mk3, SA202, 64MB, 6GB, .....philpemKILLspam.....philpem.me.uk | ViewFinder, 10BaseT Ethernet, 2-slice, http://www.philpem.me.uk/ | 48xCD, ARCINv6c IDE, SCSI ... He's a potato Jim!, Let's gouge out all of his eyes ____________________________________________