I largely agree with you, this is a good thing.
Many people learn better by seeing than reading, and some projects
just call out for a video or audio.
I hope, however, that it is redundant - you should still be able to
get the same information from the print article as you get in the
video and audio. I hate that CNN has a bunch of interesting stories
that are video only, with no transcript.
I hope it gets as cheap and easy (actually, cheaper and easier) to
document projects using pictures, video, audio, etc as it is to throw
a webpage up. There are doubtlessly tons of interesting work
happening that could be put on the web in a multitude of formats that
isn't simply because it requires significant time and money.
-Adam
On 4/4/08, Clint Sharp <EraseMEpiclistspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTmit.edu> wrote:
{Quote hidden}
> -