Searching \ for '[OT] NO intention of giving M$ another cent... :o' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=
Search entire site for: 'NO intention of giving M$ another cent... :o'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[OT] NO intention of giving M$ another cent... :o'
2003\01\02@220938 by Mike Singer

picon face
Roman Black wrote:
...
> The bad thing is that i don't own Win2000 and have
> NO intention of giving M$ another cent... :o)
...

  Hi, Roman.
  I'm rather ignorant of capitalist rules, but aren't these
very basics: if you "have NO intention of giving M$
another cent" - don't give, use other tools. Nobody will
punish you for this.
  If you find MS tools useful for their price - buy them.
Even here in the Ukraine I find them worth their price.
  Upgrading my home PC hardware costs me about
US $150 per year (taking into account I usually install
my used hardware into clients' computers).
  Upgrading my home PC software costs me (or my
client :-) comparable money.
  If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
my software product by oneself. To develop the
software product under non-MS environment I'd have
a team with all the team's problems.
  Upgrading gives me more efficient and useful tools.
(I didn't try XP). If I make some money with MS tools,
why should I expect MS has to give them away for
free?
  I don't know if they are criminals, but who is now
an angel? Let him be the first to throw stones somewhere.

  Mike.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

2003\01\03@110154 by Nate Duehr

face
flavicon
face
>    If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
> my software product by oneself. To develop the
> software product under non-MS environment I'd have
> a team with all the team's problems.

You need a team to type "vi hello.c"?  Wow...

Nate

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\03@112744 by Mitchell D. Miller

flavicon
face
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Duehr wrote:

> >    If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
> > my software product by oneself. To develop the
> > software product under non-MS environment I'd have
> > a team with all the team's problems.
>
> You need a team to type "vi hello.c"?  Wow...

Probably not, but you might to figure out how to get out of VI! (if you've
not used it before)

-- Mitch

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\03@114711 by Spehro Pefhany

picon face
At 10:19 AM 1/3/03 -0600, you wrote:
>On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Duehr wrote:
>
> > >    If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
> > > my software product by oneself. To develop the
> > > software product under non-MS environment I'd have
> > > a team with all the team's problems.
> >
> > You need a team to type "vi hello.c"?  Wow...
>
>Probably not, but you might to figure out how to get out of VI! (if you've
>not used it before)

<ROTFL> And a year or so to become proficient in emacs if you don't like
vi.  There's always pico, but people will snicker behind your back (if
you are lucky).

Best regards,

Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
spam_OUTspeffTakeThisOuTspaminterlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\03@120020 by Francisco Ares
flavicon
face
Mitchell D. Miller wrote:

>On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Nate Duehr wrote:
>
>
>>>   If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
>>>my software product by oneself. To develop the
>>>software product under non-MS environment I'd have
>>>a team with all the team's problems.
>>>
>>>
>>You need a team to type "vi hello.c"?  Wow...
>>
>>
>
>Probably not, but you might to figure out how to get out of VI! (if you've
>not used it before)
>
>-- Mitch
>
>

I think that the open-source comunity really knows how to manage a
project that has dozens of programmers spread all over the world.

There are many different ways of managing a project, ranging from one to
hundreds of programmers, one of them is CVS (besides of version control,
of course):

http://www.cvshome.org/

There are many other IDEs, including some open-source that have been
developed both for Widows and for Linux. Not mentioning Kylix/Delphi!

Take a look at:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/widestudio/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dev-cpp/

and exclusively for Linux:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/anjuta/

Sorry if I didn't put someone's favorite ;-)

Hope this helps
Francisco

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\03@135107 by Mike Singer

picon face
  Yes guys, I'm slightly stupid and I do love jokes, but, I hope, I'm not as stupid as (insert here your favorite unprintable words) to giggle at somebody's product worth him years of hard work.

  Mike.

Spehro Pefhany wrote:
{Quote hidden}

you've
> >not used it before)
>
> <ROTFL> And a year or so to become proficient in emacs if you don't
like
> vi.  There's always pico, but people will snicker behind your back (if
> you are lucky).

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\03@142817 by Patrick J

flavicon
face
> Roman Black wrote:
> > The bad thing is that i don't own Win2000 and have
> > NO intention of giving M$ another cent... :o)

Ive made a living from programming and general consulting/teaching
around MS products. And Ive sold many MS products.
I hate to abandon MS products since I have invested alot of time
into them and generally liked them so far.


With the recent license-system I first started to dislike MS.
And with their plans for Palladium/DRM I am really afraid for
my privacy if I continue to use MS operating system/products.
(do a search for 'palladium' and u will get nightmares...)
Btw, IBM's laptops are Palladium enabled already. It sometimes
is hussled under the name 'secure pc'.

I feel exactly like you Roman. MS wont get another cent from me,
nor my clients, if there is any way I can avoid it. They have gone
too far. Our goverment has came to a simular conclusion
and are dropping MS products on a wide base.

Generally MS has built a OS that spy on its users and its goal
seem to be to take full control over the PC and let MS & Co
decicde who runs and what is run on the machine that I own !

So the more Linux users we get, the less power MS will have
to force these 'features' down our throught. I have never used
Linux myself, but I will buy another PC and start to learn asap!


Just to mention a few things about Win XP:
- XP saves a list of the movies/music you have listend to.
- XP saves your IE browsing history in a number of places that
doesnt get erased when you tell it to.
- XP goes to greate lenght to hide folders from you where it
keeps tracks of information about you
- XP's indexing service searches _all_ your files and saves any readable
info
- XP has a number of 'call home features' goto http://www.xp-antispy.de
for a freeware program that disables most of that sh**.
Among other things it gets rid of is MSM messenger which
is close to impossible to uninstall.
- XP has a new funtion that forces you to call MS for a new serial,
if you change too much hardware in your computor at once.
(it will also trigger the same funtion in Office XP, Visio XP etc -
quite annoying when your in a hurry. Trust me, I know !)

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\03@143442 by Spehro Pefhany

picon face
At 08:55 PM 1/3/03 +0300, you wrote:
>    Yes guys, I'm slightly stupid and I do love jokes, but,
>I hope, I'm not as stupid as (insert here your favorite
>unprintable words) to giggle at somebody's product
>worth him years of hard work.

It's more snobbery than laughing at the product itself, which is a nice
piece of work for what it is (a compact very limited text-mode editor).

Attitudes reported as observed in Linux user group meetings.

Best regards,

Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..."            "The Journey is the reward"
.....speffKILLspamspam@spam@interlog.com             Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog  Info for designers:  http://www.speff.com

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

2003\01\04@061420 by Peter L. Peres

picon face
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Mike Singer wrote:

*>   If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
*>my software product by oneself. To develop the
*>software product under non-MS environment I'd have
*>a team with all the team's problems.

I do not agree. There are alternatives even on Windows. Look at the
Inprise/Borland products. They introduced the 'visual builder' approach a
long time ago. Worse for you, there are equivalent versions of their
builders that run on Unices.

The last big argument in favor of M$-only died imho when Sun introduced
OpenOffice/StarOffice. All the other essential applications have had
multi-platform equivalents for a long time now (some for 30 years or so
- they are history that is being 'reinvented' regularly by the clever
marketing people at that certain software firm).

Peter

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2003\01\04@181732 by Mike Singer

picon face
Peter L. Peres wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Mike Singer wrote:
>
> *>   If there were no MS Visual Studio I couldn't develop
> *>my software product by oneself. To develop the
> *>software product under non-MS environment I'd have
> *>a team with all the team's problems.
>
> I do not agree. There are alternatives even on Windows.
> Look at the Inprise/Borland products. They introduced
> the 'visual builder' approach a long time ago. Worse for
> you, there are equivalent versions of their builders that
> run on Unices.

  Yes, alternatives do exist. But the task was to develop
as quickly as possible working software product (6 to 12
months for the first limited version).
  "Visual" features were not the only things to be considered.
  - Data handling: MS Access to create database, MS ADO
     to process data.
  - User output forms: MS Excel to create a set of templates
    with rather advanced macros to flexibly solve output tasks.
  - MS Automation to enable launching Excel workbooks
    and its macros from within my application.
  - "Callbacks" mechanism to enable interaction between
    ActiveX standalone .exe modules of my app. (I chose
    not to use DLLs for some reasons).

  Perhaps Delphi was better, I don't know now. In fact I
lost one client this summer, because he was told that
Delphi was the only real instrument, not VB.

  Mike.

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2003\01\08@031358 by Nate Duehr

face
flavicon
face
Spehro Pefhany wrote:
> At 08:55 PM 1/3/03 +0300, you wrote:
>
>>    Yes guys, I'm slightly stupid and I do love jokes, but,
>> I hope, I'm not as stupid as (insert here your favorite
>> unprintable words) to giggle at somebody's product
>> worth him years of hard work.
>
>
> It's more snobbery than laughing at the product itself, which is a nice
> piece of work for what it is (a compact very limited text-mode editor).

Actually you may find that the snobbery towards pico is not directed at
the editor so much as the University of Washington's "not quite really
free but we'll let everyone slide and they'll hope we don't sue them
later" licensing agreement on the software.  People have politely
requested they change to one of the more common licenses for years, and
they continue to refuse... their own form of snobbery, I suppose.

A number of the Linux Distributions have not asked (or been granted)
permission to redistribute "modified binary files" while the license
specifically states that's not acceptable to UW.

More strict distributions do not redistribute pico (or pine, the mail
client it was created for) in anything other than source format with
patches that can be built with a compiler into a working copy that
matches their distribution's desires for file location, etc.

The pico/pine "non-free" saga has popped up every year for the last five
or six years on the Debian Linux mailing lists...  Debian is one of the
stricter distributions as regards to meeting licensing requirements for
Free Software.

Nate

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2003 , 2004 only
- Today
- New search...