Exact match. Not showing close matches.
'[OT] Least restrictive open hardware license?'
|On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 09:59:55 -0400, M. Adam Davis wrote:
:: If you want a hardware specific license, then your best bet is to
:: modify the existing gpl-like hardware licenses to remove the
:: derivative (and attribution, if you don't want your users to have
:: distribute the license and/or your name along with their products)
:: portion from the license.
This may sound flippant, but it isn't meant to be.
Surely altering someone elses licence would be breaching their or an organisations implicit copyright?
I always have this problem, I understand what copyright and patenting is for and yet in practise I find it confusing.
cdb, btech-online.co.uk on 21/08/2011 colin
Web presence: http://www.btech-online.co.uk Hosted by: http://www.justhost.com.au
This email is to be considered private if addressed to a named individual or HR department, and public if addressed to a blog, forum or news article.
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2011
, 2012 only
- New search...