Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[OT]:PCB chemistry'
2001\03\27@055520
by
Alan Gorham
I saw a discussion that started last week about PCB fabrication.
One of the messages said that the useful life of Ferric Chloride could be extended
by performing electrolysis on the solution to recover etched copper.
I have tried this and it works. I think that the cathode should be copper and that the anode should be non-cuprous to prevent a simple transfer of copper from anode to cathode.
The outcome of all this is that it removes the issue of diposal of used Ferric Chloride at least for a while as it now lasts for ages.
Hope this is useful to someone!
Alan
Embedded Systems Engineer
Microtima Ltd
Ouseburn Mews
3-7 Stepney Bank
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 2PW
Tel: 0191 2304411
Fax: 0191 2304422
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
spam_OUTpiclist-unsubscribe-requestTakeThisOuT
mitvma.mit.edu
2001\03\27@214139
by
Jinx
> Alan Gorham wrote :
>
> I saw a discussion that started last week about PCB fabrication.
> One of the messages said that the useful life of Ferric Chloride
> could be extended by performing electrolysis on the solution to
> recover etched copper.
>
> I have tried this and it works. I think that the cathode should be
> copper and that the anode should be non-cuprous to prevent a
> simple transfer of copper from anode to cathode
Do you have any figures for the V and A of the electroplating
tank ? My book deals with clean solutions of copper salts, not
those contaminated with iron. A table that shows electrode
potentials has -0.43V for Fe and +0.33V for copper. In a solution
of mixed salts isn't there going to be migration of metals out of
solution on to both electrodes ? And I think I'm correct that CuCl
is the insoluble sludge, which is going to be more difficult to
electrolyse than an aqueous solution
If so, I don't know the dissociation constant for CuCl (which will
be very low if it's insoluble) but perhaps getting the Cu out of the
liquid phase before it reacts with the Cl atoms may work better
than working on the sludge
One idea I had for this (if it works) is to copper-plate other metal
items. Decorative parts could be lacquered
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
.....piclist-unsubscribe-requestKILLspam
@spam@mitvma.mit.edu
2001\03\27@222638
by
Jinx
2001\03\28@110704
by
Alan Gorham
|
If anyone is thinking about trying the electrolysis trick on some of their
tired Ferric Chloride, then please go ahead.
I have not delved too deeply into the Chemistry of it but I have seen
results.
I etch my boards in a plastic tray about the same dimensions as A4 paper and
a depth of approx 2cm of Ferric Chloride. This gives an idea of the volume
of etchant I use.
My electrodes are a 10cm copper rod and a 10 cm steel rod.
The cathode is copper and the anode is steel. The electrodes are at 6 cm
separation and I simply hook them up to a 0-30V, 2A bench power supply.
At a current of 1A I can recover about 10g of copper in 20 minutes.
The etchant certainly seems to be noticeably more effective after this
recovery.
With regard to dangerous gases emitted: I perform the electrolysis in a fume
cabinet with the extractor running.
Since I am quite pleased with the results I have not looked too deeply into
any implications, so if anyone can say if there are good reasons to stop
then I will!!
Alan
{Original Message removed}
2001\03\28@110820
by
Bill Westfield
If you're going to go to a replenishable etchant, you might as well
go all the way to Cupric Chloride etchant, which has some other nice
features as well (such as TRANSPARENCY!)
See http://www.dnai.com/~rexa/Projects/CuCl_ech.html
I'm not sure why Iron chloride is so popular. Perhaps because it IS/WAS
an industrial chemical already, easilly available in large quantities for
low prices?
BillW
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
2001\03\28@122841
by
M. Adam Davis
|
While I could assume this is the case, I'd rather ask and know for sure:
You remove the rods from the tank when you are not performing
electrolysis, right?
Do you current-limit the supply, or does the solution limit the current
acceptably for you?
Do you clean the copper rod before each use (as it should tarnish
quickly in air)?
Have you copper plated anything just for fun?
Have you ever thought about getting a heavier layer of copper on your
PCBs by using an unetched pcb as your cathode?
-Adam
Alan Gorham wrote:
{Quote hidden}>
> If anyone is thinking about trying the electrolysis trick on some of their
> tired Ferric Chloride, then please go ahead.
> I have not delved too deeply into the Chemistry of it but I have seen
> results.
>
> I etch my boards in a plastic tray about the same dimensions as A4 paper and
> a depth of approx 2cm of Ferric Chloride. This gives an idea of the volume
> of etchant I use.
>
> My electrodes are a 10cm copper rod and a 10 cm steel rod.
> The cathode is copper and the anode is steel. The electrodes are at 6 cm
> separation and I simply hook them up to a 0-30V, 2A bench power supply.
>
> At a current of 1A I can recover about 10g of copper in 20 minutes.
> The etchant certainly seems to be noticeably more effective after this
> recovery.
>
> With regard to dangerous gases emitted: I perform the electrolysis in a fume
> cabinet with the extractor running.
>
> Since I am quite pleased with the results I have not looked too deeply into
> any implications, so if anyone can say if there are good reasons to stop
> then I will!!
>
> Alan
> {Original Message removed}
2001\03\28@214238
by
Gennette, Bruce
|
A couple of answers for you -
Current limiting is built in to the concentration of the solution and
SEPARATION of the electrodes.
Voltage should be monitored across the electrodes and limited to around 2V
(no large bubbles forming on the electrodes). You need to supply about 5V
'push' to get 2V 'flow' through the electrolyte.
Clean metal (rubbed with sand paper) is essential for electrical conduction
into/out of the electrolyte.
Without special additives the metal ions will *NOT* adhere properly to an
electrode, you just get a buildup of metal powder over the surface. Electro
plating requires special (and often poisonous) solutions held at selected pH
and temperature to achieve proper plating.
So, no, you can't expect to be able to plate things with a simple cell,
especially not existing circuit boards. You *CAN* get some success with
(dull) nickle plating if you want to protect steel, copper or brass, but
it's usually cheaper to buy parts already plated.
Bye.
{Original Message removed}
2001\03\28@233520
by
Jinx
> A couple of answers for you -
Thanks, what you said ties in with what my creaky old e-p
book says (voltage, adding acid). In e-p terms an etching
solution is well out-of-spec so I'm not expecting any sort of
professional results. More of an experiment - if it fails I
haven't lost anything, not especially fussed either way
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
2001\03\29@040438
by
Roman Black
|
Alan Gorham wrote:
{Quote hidden}>
> If anyone is thinking about trying the electrolysis trick on some of their
> tired Ferric Chloride, then please go ahead.
> I have not delved too deeply into the Chemistry of it but I have seen
> results.
>
> I etch my boards in a plastic tray about the same dimensions as A4 paper and
> a depth of approx 2cm of Ferric Chloride. This gives an idea of the volume
> of etchant I use.
>
> My electrodes are a 10cm copper rod and a 10 cm steel rod.
> The cathode is copper and the anode is steel. The electrodes are at 6 cm
> separation and I simply hook them up to a 0-30V, 2A bench power supply.
>
> At a current of 1A I can recover about 10g of copper in 20 minutes.
> The etchant certainly seems to be noticeably more effective after this
> recovery.
>
> With regard to dangerous gases emitted: I perform the electrolysis in a fume
> cabinet with the extractor running.
>
> Since I am quite pleased with the results I have not looked too deeply into
> any implications, so if anyone can say if there are good reasons to stop
> then I will!!
Thanks Alan! Does the resistance change when the
copper is completely removed from solution? Maybe
you could build a automatic circuit (using a PIC??)
that removes all the copper then switches itself
off.
-Roman
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
2001\03\29@080613
by
Bob Ammerman
> Thanks Alan! Does the resistance change when the
> copper is completely removed from solution? Maybe
> you could build a automatic circuit (using a PIC??)
> that removes all the copper then switches itself
> off.
> -Roman
Yeah, but then the etchant would immediately start working away on the
copper electrode!
Bob Ammerman
RAm Systems
(contract development of high performance, high function, low-level
software)
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
2001\03\29@082952
by
Kevin Blain
...and then goes into 'trickle charge' where a small current flows to keep
the copper on the electrode
...or a servo/motor pulls the electrode out
...and makes the tea....
Kevin
{Original Message removed}
2001\03\29@172941
by
Alan Gorham
Roman - How technical do you want to make it!!! :-)
All I do is whack the electrodes into the etchant, turn on the extractor fan
in the fume cupboard, go and have a cup of tea and then come back.
I WILL check for a change in resistance though!
Alan
{Original Message removed}
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2001
, 2002 only
- Today
- New search...