Searching \ for '[OT]:Best rebate deal I have ever seen .... cannot' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=best+rebate+deal
Search entire site for: 'Best rebate deal I have ever seen .... cannot'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[OT]:Best rebate deal I have ever seen .... cannot'
2006\07\25@121831 by Gus S Calabrese

face picon face
go look at my server at http://www.oh-god.com/rebate

After looking at what Tiger is offering, I will be offering my own
rebate.

Scroll down to see .......



















Deluxe pack of chewing gum only 1 penny after rebate.
Inaccurate rebate  refund submissions will be redlined and returned  
for resubmission.
Unlike some firms we intend to honor 100% of rebate refund requests.  
That is right, 100% .

allow 8 to 10 months for rebate check.

Original price for chewing gum is $450,000.  After rebate ( $  
449,999.99 ) price to you is 1 penny.

Gus S Calabrese
Denver, CO
720 222 1309     303 908 7716 cell
Please include and do not limit yourself to "spam2006". I allow  
everything with  "spam2006"  in the subject or text to pass my spam  
filters.



2006\07\25@183807 by Jinx

face picon face
What is a "mail-in rebate" ?

2006\07\25@184521 by Jinx

face picon face
I asked (before Googling for myself, tut tut)

"What is a mail-in rebate" ?

Don't believe that sort of marketing operates in NZ

http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6l53f/confessionsofamailinrebatejunkie/

Not sure if appeals to me anyway, I'm not big on consuming

2006\07\25@194124 by Philip Pemberton

face picon face
Jinx wrote:
> What is a "mail-in rebate" ?

Basically, you pay full price at the till, then you have to send your receipt
off to the company and ideally they send you the cheque for the rebate amount.

Apparently they try every trick in the book to get you to give up on claiming
the rebate... "We lost your application", "it wasn't bought on the day of a
full moon", "please wait at least 52 weeks for delivery of your cheque"...

--
Phil.                         | Kitsune: Acorn RiscPC SA202 64M+6G ViewFinder
spam_OUTphilpemTakeThisOuTspamdsl.pipex.com         | Cheetah: Athlon64 3200+ A8VDeluxeV2 512M+100G
http://www.philpem.me.uk/     | Tiger: Toshiba SatPro4600 Celeron700 256M+40G

2006\07\25@221815 by Ling SM
picon face
>>What is a "mail-in rebate" ?
>
>
> Basically, you pay full price at the till, then you have to send your receipt
> off to the company and ideally they send you the cheque for the rebate amount.
>
> Apparently they try every trick in the book to get you to give up on claiming
> the rebate... "We lost your application", "it wasn't bought on the day of a
> full moon", "please wait at least 52 weeks for delivery of your cheque"...

I fell for a HP's rebate.  The reasons they gave were:
1. "Need to check", will get back but never
2. "Person in charge not around", will get back but never
3. "Change of Person in charge", will get back but never
4. "Sorry, your coupon is from the old promotion." will get back but never

Still no money back.  The rebate amount is one thing I was cheated, but
was insignificant compare to the amount of time I was cheated.

Ling SM

2006\07\25@223017 by D. Jay Newman

flavicon
face
> I fell for a HP's rebate.  The reasons they gave were:
> 1. "Need to check", will get back but never
> 2. "Person in charge not around", will get back but never
> 3. "Change of Person in charge", will get back but never
> 4. "Sorry, your coupon is from the old promotion." will get back but never
>
> Still no money back.  The rebate amount is one thing I was cheated, but
> was insignificant compare to the amount of time I was cheated.
>
> Ling SM

I think you were cheated because you bought HP. :)

That being said, I've never had a problem with a mail-in rebate, except
the time it took for the rebate to get to me (no more than two months,
though).
--
D. Jay Newman           ! Author of:
.....jayKILLspamspam@spam@sprucegrove.com     ! _Linux Robotics: Programming Smarter Robots_
http://enerd.ws/robots/ ! "Heros aren't born, they're cornered."

2006\07\25@224913 by Russell McMahon

face
flavicon
face
> "What is a mail-in rebate" ?
> Don't believe that sort of marketing operates in NZ
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6l53f/confessionsofamailinrebatejunkie/
>
> Not sure if appeals to me anyway, I'm not big on consuming

There is some of this done in NZ.
Look at bottom end laptops and PC which sometimes have about $100 MIR
attached.

Some other products too

       Russell


2006\07\26@103846 by M. Adam Davis

face picon face
For the record, I've done a variety of rebates and have never had a
problem getting my money back.

There are a few reasons for rebates, the major one being that the
manufacturer wants to move stock out of retailer inventory (to make
room for a surplus, to make room for the next model, etc).  Since the
retailer has already purchased the items, they either can disburse
money to the retailer for each item, or they can offer a rebate to the
end consumer.

Rebate redemption, I understand, is actually pretty high (80-90%
range), so the manufacturer doesn't make a lot of money on lost
rebates.  The rebate fulfillment centers cost quite a bit of money to
run (handwritten rebate forms, illegible receipts from different
retailers, scam artists, etc) so in general the "savings" of those
customers that never turn in rebates is lost in the cost of fulfilling
everyone else's rebates.

Another reason that I've wondered about, but never had verified is
that some rebates are essentially a 4-6 week 0% interest loan for the
retailer or manufacturer.  You can do a lot with a few million dollars
for a month.  But that's me being capitalist/cynical.

Many retailers in the US have heard the cry of the consumer against
rebates and most are making it as easy as possible to get rebate
fulfillment.  Due to the ease which these things can be scammed,
though, it's a non-trivial task.  Retailers also can't control whether
a manufacturer sets up a rebate for a product they carry, and if they
don't advertise the rebate when everyone else does they may end up
with dead stock that won't sell when the rebate is done - no one will
buy the now overpriced merchandise.

So it's a fairly complex system, driven mainly by the desire to move stock.

But no one really likes it.  Not the manufacturer, retailer, or consumer.

-Adam

On 7/25/06, Jinx <joecolquittspamKILLspamclear.net.nz> wrote:
> I asked (before Googling for myself, tut tut)
>
> "What is a mail-in rebate" ?
>
> Don't believe that sort of marketing operates in NZ
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6l53f/confessionsofamailinrebatejunkie/
>
> Not sure if appeals to me anyway, I'm not big on consuming
>
> -

2006\07\26@135359 by Gerhard Fiedler

picon face
M. Adam Davis wrote:

> Another reason that I've wondered about, but never had verified is
> that some rebates are essentially a 4-6 week 0% interest loan for the
> retailer or manufacturer.  

That's not how I see it. I never bought stuff that I didn't need or that
was overpriced without rebate -- basically only buying stuff that if I
didn't get the rebate I wouldn't have the feeling that I got scammed; just
not that good a deal then.

So I bought a normal product for a normal price. After some time, with a
certain probability, I get a part of that price back. I don't really see
that as a loan to anybody, not more (and much less) than a normal purchase.

This is a bit different when the product is only worth to you what you pay
after rebate. Then you'd have to factor in all kinds of things: interest
rates, cash flow situation, probability of reimbursement, effort to get
reimbursed, ...

Gerhard

2006\07\27@005020 by Gus S Calabrese

face picon face

On 2006-Jul 26, at 07:23hrs AM, M. Adam Davis wrote:

For the record, I've done a variety of rebates and have never had a
problem getting my money back.

There are a few reasons for rebates, the major one being that the
manufacturer wants to move stock out of retailer inventory (to make
room for a surplus, to make room for the next model, etc).  Since the
retailer has already purchased the items, they either can disburse
money to the retailer for each item, or they can offer a rebate to the
end consumer.

Rebate redemption, I understand, is actually pretty high (80-90%
range), so the manufacturer doesn't make a lot of money on lost
rebates.  The rebate fulfillment centers cost quite a bit of money to
run (handwritten rebate forms, illegible receipts from different
retailers, scam artists, etc) so in general the "savings" of those
customers that never turn in rebates is lost in the cost of fulfilling
everyone else's rebates.

Another reason that I've wondered about, but never had verified is
that some rebates are essentially a 4-6 week 0% interest loan for the
retailer or manufacturer.  You can do a lot with a few million dollars
for a month.  But that's me being capitalist/cynical.

----- That is exactly what some rebates are all about. AGSC ----

Many retailers in the US have heard the cry of the consumer against
rebates and most are making it as easy as possible to get rebate
fulfillment.  Due to the ease which these things can be scammed,
though, it's a non-trivial task.  Retailers also can't control whether
a manufacturer sets up a rebate for a product they carry, and if they
don't advertise the rebate when everyone else does they may end up
with dead stock that won't sell when the rebate is done - no one will
buy the now overpriced merchandise.

So it's a fairly complex system, driven mainly by the desire to move  
stock.

But no one really likes it.  Not the manufacturer, retailer, or  
consumer.

-Adam

On 7/25/06, Jinx <.....joecolquittKILLspamspam.....clear.net.nz> wrote:
> I asked (before Googling for myself, tut tut)
>
> "What is a mail-in rebate" ?
>
> Don't believe that sort of marketing operates in NZ
>
> http://mysite.verizon.net/vze6l53f/confessionsofamailinrebatejunkie/
>
> Not sure if appeals to me anyway, I'm not big on consuming
>
> -

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2006 , 2007 only
- Today
- New search...