Searching \ for '[OT]: Teaching Math' in subject line. ()
Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/method/math.htm?key=math
Search entire site for: 'Teaching Math'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
'[OT]: Teaching Math'
2002\10\16@210025 by

Courtesy of Bbob:

Teaching Math in 1950:
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for \$100. His cost of
production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?

Teaching Math in 1960:
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for \$100. His cost of
production is 4/5 of the price, or \$80. What is his profit?

Teaching Math in 1970: A logger exchanges a set "L" of
lumber for a set "M" of money. The cardinality of set "M" is
100. Each element is worth one dollar. Make 100 dots
representing the elements of the set "M." The set "C", the
cost of production contains 20 fewer points than set "M."
Represent the set "C" as a subset of set "M" and answer the
following question: What is the cardinality of the set "P" of
profits?

Teaching Math in 1980: A logger sells a truckload of lumber
for \$100. His cost of production is \$80 and his profit is \$20.
Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

Teaching Math in 1990:
By cutting down beautiful forest trees, the logger makes \$20.
What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for
class participation after answering the question: How did the
forest birds and squirrels "feel" as the logger cut down the
trees? There are no wrong answers.

Teaching Math in 2002:
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for \$100. His cost of
production is \$120. How does Arthur Andersen determine
that his profit margin is \$60?

Teaching Math in 2010:
El hachero vende un camion carga por \$100. La cuesta de
production es . . .

bb

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

Very good :).

I was at school during the 'B' and 'C' years, I'm still traumatised
(must get round to suing my primary school one of these days) from
when at age 8 the dreaded B & A book of Mathematical Problems was
hauled out.

I can still remember - If it takes 2 men 4 hours to fill a 5 gallon
bath with cold water from a Well, how long would it take 1 man to
fill a 2 gallon bath?

To this day maths couched in the above way cause me great problems -
and yet write it in  different context and I'm fine.

At the tender age of 8 my  thought process was; what if the second
bath was filled with HOT water, would hot water flow faster or slower
than cold? Was it the same Well, did one man walk slower or faster
than the other?

By the time I'd gone round in circles by reading far too much into
the question and being told I was asking nonsensical questions, th e
lesson would have finished  and we'd be off on English - by far my
more favourite subject.

Colin
--
cdb, bodgy1optusnet.com.au on 17/10/2002

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

Russell McMahon wrote:
>
> Teaching Math in 1950:
> A logger sells a truckload of lumber for \$100. His cost of
> production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?
>
> Teaching Math in 1960:
> A logger sells a truckload of lumber for \$100. His cost of
> production is 4/5 of the price, or \$80. What is his profit?
>
> Teaching Math in 1970: A logger exchanges a set "L" of
> lumber for a set "M" of money. The cardinality of set "M" is
> 100. Each element is worth one dollar. Make 100 dots
> representing the elements of the set "M." The set "C", the
> cost of production contains 20 fewer points than set "M."
> Represent the set "C" as a subset of set "M" and answer the
> following question: What is the cardinality of the set "P" of
> profits?

I think "Teaching Math in 1950" should be red as
" Teaching Math in 1960" and vice versa. Teaching
Math improved dramatically in USA in 1960 after
Soviet successful ballistic launches with nuclear
warheads, first "Sputnik" and first man on Earth's
orbit Gagarin.

Mike. :-)

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

> Teaching Math in 2002:
> A logger sells a truckload of lumber for \$100. His cost of
> production is \$120. How does Arthur Andersen determine
> that his profit margin is \$60?
>
> Teaching Math in 2010:
> El hachero vende un camion carga por \$100. La cuesta de
> production es . . .

Teaching Math in 2010:

Oil ships and letters from right to left.

Mike.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

>Courtesy of Bbob:
>
>Teaching Math in 1950:
...
>Teaching Math in 1960:
...
>Teaching Math in 1980:
...
>Teaching Math in 1990:
...
>Teaching Math in 2002:
...
>Teaching Math in 2010:

How does academic fashion come and go, and why? Perhaps because only
government can screw things up, degrade and dominate those it is responsible
to, and profit from it, as long as no competing entity is around to punish
it.

Scott

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

> How does academic fashion come and go, and why? Perhaps because only
> government can screw things up, degrade and dominate those it is
responsible
> to, and profit from it, as long as no competing entity is around to punish
> it.

The interesting thing is that, both here in NZ and in the US people read
this and KNOW it is more or less true.

Note that it is not academic fashion, it is social engineering that largely
drives it.

RM

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

Subject: Re: [OT]: Teaching Math

>> How does academic fashion come and go, and why?

>Note that it is not academic fashion, it is social engineering that largely
>drives it.

And what is the spirit behind this 'social engineering', and what is the
premise it is based on? They claim our time and treasure for the common
good, and when it comes time to deliver, what do they deliver?

My personal experience has been government and corporations will find plenty
of excuses to tax, degrade and exploit you, and if you attempt to claim a
benefit, or demand they perform their duty, they find plenty of excuses to
disqualify you, or shirk their responsibility.

I have seen this spirit, this evil, predatory desire behind thousands of
excuses and circumstances. Often conservatives point out the symptoms of the
illness, the methods of the Beast, but they never quite get a hold of its
high-contrast caricatures illustrate the method of the madness well (the
dissolusioned, dumbed-down Catherine and Ellsworth's chapter-long speech to
Keeting about power - destroying the identities and wills of others while
appearing to be a saint, for instance).

My point - it is better to fight smarter, not harder. Good camouflage,
deception, means less energy expended by the predator to hunt down the prey.
Predators inhibit, degrade, competitors in jungle, to dominate food supply
and gene pool. In society, inhibition works through the will of the mob, the
tyranny of charisma and popularity, to inhibit the will of the mob, the will
and identity of its individuals through humiliation and brutality to the
will of the popular. Or you can examine chaotic systems such as neural
networks - a collection of unstable oscillators coupled in geometric
configurations. Some communities of neurons/switching elements establish
oscillatory patterns that entrain other communities and elements, causing
them to phase-lock to the popular mode, rather than freely-firing according
to their own limit cycles.

That is the fruit of public eduction, not its conscious, overt, stated goal,
but the unconscious demonic desire in the hearts of those that are intent on
destroying the individual identities of the members of the 'public', so that
they can be reformed into what the establishment desires. It is not about
ideology or what color uniforms (fasion), it is about who gets to choose the
ideology and the fasion. It is about the desire for power and the desire to
degrade the hearts and minds of others, their independant will.

Public housing, public education, public toilets.

Scott

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

Russell McMahon wrote:
>> How does academic fashion come and go, and why? Perhaps because only
>> government can screw things up, degrade and dominate those it is
>> responsible to, and profit from it, as long as no competing entity
>> is around to punish it.
>
> The interesting thing is that, both here in NZ and in the US people
> read this and KNOW it is more or less true.
>
> Note that it is not academic fashion, it is social engineering that
> largely drives it.
>

Other interesting point, is that while our US school's math still going
south, other 3rd World countries still teaching "regular math" and their
children still being very welcome in US to become teachers in math,
physics, economy and science.  My daughter (12) in 6th grade never heard
about logarithm or sine in an US public school, but she did learn it at
home. When I was 12 in Brazil I was playing with log tables (heavy books)
and solving puzzles with a plastic math slider (Pentel?).  It is amazing
that math is so vast, that during the last 2 years in school they still
doing the same old 12x12 exercises, to tell you the truth, it is a shame.
Looks like they are just leveling all students by the weak, so nobody is
left behind.  When she was at 2nd grade she already knew the 12x12 table by
memory, not from school, but from me, and she felt very competitive and
proud.

It seems that people just forgot that children are just small, not stupid.
You go to any K-Mart or Wal-Mart and stick \$23.00 in dollar bills to the
cashier to pay a \$13 purchase, the cashier gets lost, she will first return
your "extra" \$3.00, and then will provide you the \$7.00 change... it is a
complete and insane shame. What is it? No one "expects" that a cashier
attendant should do mind math? Come on, simple math should be done by
everyone, since 2nd or 3rd grade, and not only economy masters, accountants
or teachers.  You don't need to study 15 years of math to recognize \$23 in
a \$13 purchase means you are helping the change and her job.  Just as a
test, I did it several times in the same week, in several stores and gas
stations - the most common talk was "oh, you gave more (money) than you
need"...  You see, for them, the stupid WAS ME!, and probably they were
right.

So, if I can calculate the impedance of a transistor by mind, without a
calculator, what this makes me? a math-super-hero? an all-star-bright
scientist? a complete nerd?  Should I be nominated to some Nobel Prize? No!
a simple person that did learn things to have a better and easier life.

I wonder what daily crosses the mind of someone that "needs to think" about
how much is 3 times 5 or what is the 5th letter of the alphabet, or where
is the north (with a shine sun in the sky at 6pm), or what is the rotation
to screw a garden hose, or to sharpen a pencil.

It is amazing how many dumb and know nothing people is around.  Most of
them have 5 years of university, believe it or not - most of them remember
only what means "buenos dias" from almost 2 years of Spanish learning -
most of them have not a single clue where is Constantinople - most of them
just ask for help to replace a flat tire, they can wait 4 hours in the sun
to get that help - most of them simply don't know how many zeroes go to
write one billion or a trillion - most of them never heard about "octanes"
even after 3 years of chemical at school - most of them have no idea if
Mercury is closer to the Sun than Earth - most of them think "Sputnik" is a
rock band's name - most of them think Neil Armstrong is some sports
player - lots of them think the composer Bethowen still alive - if asked to
choose between Paco Rabane or Moshe Daian, they will choose Rabane as the
Mona Lisa's painter.

As you can see, math problem is just the tip of the iceberg.  If your
culture can't learn math, it is just because the whole system below the sea
level is horrendous and doesn't give any base to learn anything else. I
could use math as the learning indicator, if your math is bad, there is a
enourmous chance you don't have a minimum idea what means hemoglobulin or
what is the speed of sound.

Of course you can't label people by the knowledge, but you can predict how
a person is able to solve life problems by himself based on the ability to
answer how much is 75% of 200 Dollars without using a calculator.

Kids are kids in every country.  There is no CHESS DNA in kids borning in
the old soviet countries, at 10 years old they are almost chess world
champions, and they are proud of it. Much more than adults, kids have a
natural hunger for knowledge, and we must feed them with everything we can,
if not, we will propagating stupidity to the upcoming generations.  At
least my kids know what means "prime numbers and know how to recognize
some - all their school friends have no idea what means "prime".

What is missing?

W46NER

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

Scott Stephens wrote:
{Quote hidden}

Scott, even that english is not my born language, I can not agree more with
you, we're fully damned. But tell me, what a hell you said above? is this
about a new fruit juice or something?

:P

W46NER.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

Guys, this one has dragged on quite long enough.  I fully appreciate and
don't necessarily disagree with your viewpoints, but the PICList is not
the venue for airng them.  Thanks in advance for letting this one die
quietly, it's way too far OT already.

Dale
---
We are Dyslexia of Borg.
Fusistance is retile.

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

Wagner Lipnharski wrote:
[snip]
> Kids are kids in every country.  There is no CHESS DNA in kids borning in
> the old soviet countries, at 10 years old they are almost chess world
> champions, and they are proud of it. Much more than adults, kids have a
> natural hunger for knowledge, and we must feed them with everything we can,
> if not, we will propagating stupidity to the upcoming generations.

Well said! We can only hope that the parents on this list will read and heed.

-Nick

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email listservmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body

Sheesh.  Invasion of rabid trolls?

BillW

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: To leave the PICList
piclist-unsubscribe-requestmitvma.mit.edu

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2002 , 2003 only
- Today
- New search...