Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[OT]: Blanket Disclaimers (was: "Re: [PIC]: Newbie'
2004\11\30@155821
by
Andrew Warren
|
Nate Duehr <spam_OUTpiclistTakeThisOuT
mit.edu> wrote:
> > ====================================================================
> > This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only.
> > The information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected
> > by law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
> > must not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
> > person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
> > received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
> > forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly
> > prohibited. No part of this message can be considered a request for
> > goods or services.
> > ====================================================================
>
> p.s. The above disclaimer is worthless
Actually, it's potentially WORSE than worthless:
1. Because you explicitly acknowledge the possibility of those
problems, you may find yourself unable to deny responsibility for
them if they occur. For example:
I share confidential information with you under an NDA.
You try to email it to someone within your company, but
accidentally send it to my fiercest competitor.
When I sue you, it'll be hard for you to say that you were
unaware that email could be misdirected.
2. The disclaimer may even expose you to MORE liability, since
if you're aware of a potential problem, you may be expected to
do something to prevent it. "[We] accept no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email", for
example, is just asking for trouble.
3. Giving the false impression that the disclaimer is legally
binding (when you know perfectly well that it isn't) may cause
problems.
4. If you specifically prohibit some actions, it may be inferred
that, by omission, you are allowing all others, e.g., "Ok, I
can't forward or print this email... But I can take a JPEG
screenshot of it and send THAT to the newspapers, right?"
5. The text in most disclaimers is irritatingly stupid, so it
makes you look stupid, too. From the disclaimer quoted above,
for example:
"[if] you have received this e-mail, .... return the
original to us."
-Andy
Even this disclaimer is potentially troublesome:
=== Andrew Warren -- .....aiwKILLspam
@spam@cypress.com
=== Principal Design Engineer
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
===
=== Opinions expressed above do not
=== necessarily represent those of
=== Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
____________________________________________
2004\11\30@163557
by
Mike Hord
|
====================================================================
> > > This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only.
> > > The information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected
> > > by law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
> > > must not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
> > > person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
> > > received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
> > > forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly
> > > prohibited. No part of this message can be considered a request for
> > > goods or services.
> > > ====================================================================
> >
> > p.s. The above disclaimer is worthless
>
> Actually, it's potentially WORSE than worthless:
Unless I miss my guess, based on my observations of the person
whose e-mail that was culled from, it's something that, at a minimum,
his IT manager makes him add, and more likely, it's something that
his outgoing mail server adds whether he wants it or not.
And if he'd like a Gmail account, I have invites and I'd be glad to send
him one... ;-)
Mike H.
____________________________________________
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2004
, 2005 only
- Today
- New search...