>
> >  The knowledge of the members of this list is an awesome resource.
> >  That knowledge and expertise comes at a price.  And in my opinion,
> >  a very small price.  That price being you have to deal with the
> >  posts that you are not interested in to get the information you
> >  are interested in.   Come on people, what do you expect, really?
> >  We live in an imperfect world, and no amount of complaining or
> >  restructuring of protocol will make it perfect.  You can always
> >  improve things, but they'll never be perfect.  This list is one of
> >  those things.
> >  Bottom line from my perspective...
> >  I'll take the chaff with the wheat. I get rid of the chaff myself,
> >  and live on the wheat.  No one need be the wiser.
>
> Yep, I agree with all of that.
> Like most people here, my time is valuable; but the time it takes to
> scan a message and hit Next isn't worth the smallest fraction of what I
> get in return.
>
> I also have no problem with tachometer discussions, nor liquid level, IR
> detection, etc. It's a rare PICster that never connects to anything but
> a PC. Quite often these discussions inspire a new way of looking at
> other problems.
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>     .-.
>    /   \           .-.                                 .-.
>   /     \         /   \       .-.     _     .-.       /   \
> -/-------\-------/-----\-----/---\---/-\---/---\-----/-----\-------/
>           \     /       \   /     `-'   `-'     \   /       \     /
>            \   /         `-'                     `-'         \   /
>             `-'                                               `-'
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> .