James,
Do you have another machine with a packet-sniffer in it??
I think what you're going to find is that your machine that can't talk
to the 66.x.x.x network machine never ARP's for it, it just forwards
packets destined for that machine to its default router because it's
outide of it's network range, as defined by its IP address and it's
network mask.
You should see an ARP "whohas" 66.13.172.18 on the hub as the very first
thing that machine does to try to find the other machine. Since you're
plugged into a hub, the 66.x.x.x machine should see this ARP broadcast
and reply, thus bypassing the router.
But if that handshake isn't occurring, then the internal 192.168.x.x
machine is having to forward all packets for other hosts to the router's
internal address, and then the router is having a hard time figuring out
that the 66.x.x.x address is actually on its internal interfce. I
missed it in the reply chain, but I'm assuming this is a NAT setup to
get to that machine?
Anyway, Ethereal or another packet sniffer will quickly tell the
story....
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 08:23:45PM -0700, James Newton, webhost wrote:
{Quote hidden}
--
Nate Duehr <.....nateKILLspam
.....natetech.com>
--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email EraseMElistservspam_OUT
TakeThisOuTmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body