Post by thread:[EE] ENC28J60 Samples

nice. where to get firmware? tcp/ip seems too big to handle within one week. or a team work? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Smith" <spam_OUTgaloophTakeThisOuTgmail.com> To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <.....piclistKILLspam@spam@mit.edu> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:45 AM Subject: [EE] ENC28J60 Samples > The ENC28J60 is now available to sample from > www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1953& device=en022889 > > Just ordered some to play with :-) > > Dan > > -

At 11:52 AM 12/6/2005 -0500, you wrote: >nice. where to get firmware? > >tcp/ip seems too big to handle within one week. > >or a team work? Eh. Here's most of it: http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/mstkv220401.zip Microchip will release an updated PIC18 TCP/IP stack by the end of December, they say. Current version will compile with either MCC18 or Hitch PICC 18. Best regards, Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward" speffKILLspaminterlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com ->> Inexpensive test equipment & parts http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZspeff

A reminder that a board is available from: http://www.edtp.com/ Here's a big picture: http://www.edtp.com/framethrower.htm David DavidSpehro Pefhany wrote: {Quote hidden}> At 11:52 AM 12/6/2005 -0500, you wrote: > >> nice. where to get firmware? >> >> tcp/ip seems too big to handle within one week. >> >> or a team work? > > > Eh. Here's most of it: > http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/mstkv220401.zip > > > Microchip will release an updated PIC18 TCP/IP stack by the end of > December, > they say. > > Current version will compile with either MCC18 or Hitch PICC 18. > > Best regards, > > Spehro Pefhany --"it's the network..." "The Journey is the > reward" > .....speffKILLspam.....interlog.com Info for manufacturers: > http://www.trexon.com > Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: > http://www.speff.com > ->> Inexpensive test equipment & parts > http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZspeff > >

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, microsoftwarecontrol wrote: > nice. where to get firmware? > > tcp/ip seems too big to handle within one week. I think that it depends whether you have some boilerplate code to build on and the correct version of standards. What would be more interesting would be a realistic evaluation of the CPU support required. I.e. what is the smallest/slowest cpu that will work with a minimal protocol using this chip. Say, just ARP and ping. Or even simpler just broadcast 'ping-alikes' with HWADDR as payload (sans ARP) and listen for same. > or a team work? That's a good one imho. Other: it has 32*4 registers to set up. Assuming one is normal and has an error rate of ~2%, it should take about 10 tries to get it working for the first time ... any chance that Microchip publish an application note with a minimal setup to save some time ? There are no application notes with ENC28... in the title yet. Surely they are using *something* to test it with ? Last: has anyone else noticed a large delay and the need to reload when loading some pages from Microchip today (cca. 2200 UTC 6 Dec. 2005) ? Peter

All I have to say is WOW! Finally I get to play with the ethernet interface . I always wanted ethernet interfaces in my projects but the prices were unattractive. John --- Dan Smith <EraseMEgaloophspam_OUTTakeThisOuTgmail.com> wrote: > The ENC28J60 is now available to sample from > www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1953&device=en022889 > > Just ordered some to play with :-) > > Dan > > -

I asked sample and will go up to 18f now. Hope my tons 16f/c code are runnable in 18f. What I hope for pic is run java me in it, very simple kind. Long way to go! Now I am so uncomfortable in 18f3456, this kind of naming, when chosing correct pic. Peolple can'nt memory 4 digits number well. 3 is maxum. I really hope microchip use more charaters to mark their chip and nubmering them is very bad way. Now, IT system has no any problem to handling this kind of naming "18F I2C SPI 10ADC 4PWM ExtraECAN SamePrice". But now, you need make difficult translation/reference from 4 meaningless digits to the functions you are really paying attention. I think I am going to send microchip a email, complain about 4 digits naming. 3 is not enough? Why 4? {Original Message removed}