Searching \ for '[EE] Amplifier Circuit' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=amplifier+circuit
Search entire site for: 'Amplifier Circuit'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[EE] Amplifier Circuit'
2004\10\13@014242 by n Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar

picon face
Hi,
I've got a problem with my amplifier circuit. It's suppose to be a
simple 1000x amplification circuit, using LM833.

Instead of amplifying, my circuit is actually 'de-amplify'. By
observation, when i put a signal of around 5 V, the output from the
first amplifier is around 1V, and around few mV at the output of the
second amplifier.

I was trying to look at the datasheet for some clue, but fail to do so.

I tried before with a LF356 circuit to amplify, and it works well. So,
i can't find any reason why an op amp doesn't amplify.

If someone could help, that would be greatly appreciated.

>From wan
spam_OUTwanzulhelmiTakeThisOuTspamgmail.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@020628 by David Duffy

flavicon
face
Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:

>Hi,
>I've got a problem with my amplifier circuit. It's suppose to be a
>simple 1000x amplification circuit, using LM833.
>
>Instead of amplifying, my circuit is actually 'de-amplify'. By
>observation, when i put a signal of around 5 V, the output from the
>first amplifier is around 1V, and around few mV at the output of the
>second amplifier.
>
>I was trying to look at the datasheet for some clue, but fail to do so.
>
>I tried before with a LF356 circuit to amplify, and it works well. So,
>i can't find any reason why an op amp doesn't amplify.
>
>If someone could help, that would be greatly appreciated.
>  
>

Got a circuit we can look at?
David...
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@022052 by Dave VanHorn

flavicon
face
At 12:42 AM 10/13/2004, Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:

>Hi,
>I've got a problem with my amplifier circuit. It's suppose to be a
>simple 1000x amplification circuit, using LM833.

1000x DC amplification?  Input offset errors could be eating you alive.

Looking at the specs, the LF356 also has 10 or 5 mV offset, but it's input
bias current is way lower.

Check the effect that the input bias current would have in your circuit.
http://ecircuitcenter.com/Circuits/op_ibias/op_ibias.htm

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@022410 by n Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar

picon face
part 1 1517 bytes content-type:text/plain; charset=US-ASCII (decoded 7bit)

Hi,
The file. Thanks


On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:18:27 +1000, Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar
<.....wanzulhelmiKILLspamspam@spam@gmail.com> wrote:
{Quote hidden}


part 2 10851 bytes content-type:image/bmp; name="amplifier.bmp" (decode)


part 3 194 bytes content-type:text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
(decoded 7bit)

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@024354 by David Duffy

flavicon
face
Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:

>Hi,
>The file. Thanks
>  
>

What frequency are you trying to use?
The 100pF seems way to low with the 10K resistor.
David...
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@024446 by n Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar

picon face
HI,
Yeah, the DC offset is quite high. In  my first amplification, my
offset is about 10V. But, a good choice of capacitor should enable me
to kick off some of those offset, right. I am still doing try and
error with that.

With LM833, it should be low noise dual amplifier, that's why i am
using that instead of 356(i have to cascade a few times to get the
1000 times amplification).

Still bugging me.

ANd another major issue is that the range is much lower. I can't
amplify a signal that is located at far distance.

Maybe, its hard to explain unless you see it.





On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 01:21:35 -0500, Dave VanHorn <.....dvanhornKILLspamspam.....dvanhorn.org> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@025554 by n Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar

picon face
Hi,
I am trying to send a 40 kHz signal through a transducer. At the
receiver, i am using a bandpass and an amplifier
configuration(amplying at 1000x as the signal receive through the
transducer is really small).

Is it really too small?


On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:43:45 +1000, David Duffy
<EraseMEdavidspam_OUTspamTakeThisOuTaudiovisualdevices.com.au> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@034920 by hael Rigby-Jones

picon face


>-----Original Message-----
>From: piclist-bouncesspamspam_OUTmit.edu [@spam@piclist-bouncesKILLspamspammit.edu]
>On Behalf Of Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar
>Sent: 13 October 2004 07:56
>To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
>Subject: Re: [EE] Amplifier Circuit
>
>
>Hi,
>I am trying to send a 40 kHz signal through a transducer. At
>the receiver, i am using a bandpass and an amplifier
>configuration(amplying at 1000x as the signal receive through
>the transducer is really small).
>
>Is it really too small?


Yes, way too small. The reactance of a 100pF cap at 40kHz is nearly 40k.
This gives your circuit a -3dB frequency of around 159kHz, at 40kHz you are
over 12dB down!  I'd suggest somewhere around 10n should be ok at 40kHz.

Regards

Mike

=======================================================================
This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The
information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must
not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or
services.
=======================================================================
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@101804 by Paul Hutchinson

picon face
>-----Original Message-----
>From: KILLspampiclist-bouncesKILLspamspammit.edu [RemoveMEpiclist-bouncesTakeThisOuTspammit.edu]On Behalf
>Of Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar
>Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 1:43 AM
>
>Hi,
>I've got a problem with my amplifier circuit. It's suppose to be a
>simple 1000x amplification circuit, using LM833.

IME, there is no such thing as a "simple" 1000x amplifier, that's a lot of
gain.

>Instead of amplifying, my circuit is actually 'de-amplify'. By
>observation, when i put a signal of around 5 V, the output from the
>first amplifier is around 1V, and around few mV at the output of the
>second amplifier.

With 5V in and 1000x amplification you would get 5000V out, this isn't going
to happen with a 12V supply. Try putting in 0.005V (5mV) and you have a
better chance of seeing an output, 5mV x 1000 = 5V.

Hope this helps,
Paul

{Quote hidden}

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@103826 by Dave VanHorn

flavicon
face
At 01:55 AM 10/13/2004, Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:

>Hi,
>I am trying to send a 40 kHz signal through a transducer. At the
>receiver, i am using a bandpass and an amplifier
>configuration(amplying at 1000x as the signal receive through the
>transducer is really small).
>
>Is it really too small?


What are the slew rates of these amplifiers?
It's possible that the chip you're using can't get that much gain at 40 kHz.


_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@105743 by hael Rigby-Jones

picon face


{Quote hidden}

The LM833 has a gain/bandwidth product of 15MHz, 100x @ 40KHz = 4MHz so
should be ok.

Mike

=======================================================================
This e-mail is intended for the person it is addressed to only. The
information contained in it may be confidential and/or protected by
law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you must
not make any use of this information, or copy or show it to any
person. Please contact us immediately to tell us that you have
received this e-mail, and return the original to us. Any use,
forwarding, printing or copying of this message is strictly prohibited.
No part of this message can be considered a request for goods or
services.
=======================================================================
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@123826 by Bill & Pookie

picon face
Is a bandpass filter necessary?  Isn't the xducer simply a bandpass filter
itself?

Loose the bandpass filter and loose some attenuation?

Bill

ps  First post on here after a few years absence, so be gentle if problems
please.


{Original Message removed}

2004\10\13@124406 by Dave VanHorn

flavicon
face
At 11:36 AM 10/13/2004, Bill & Pookie wrote:

>Is a bandpass filter necessary?  Isn't the xducer simply a bandpass filter
>itself?
>
>Loose the bandpass filter and loose some attenuation?

Not a horrid idea, unless he's picking up other junk, which is another
problem in itself.

Maybe he needs to tell us a bit more, rather than having us look at slices
through a keyhole?

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@184140 by n Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar

picon face
Hi,
It's quite true that the transducer is already a bandpass filter. But,
then again, the filter is just to be safe there. No harm in doing
that,(except that maybe it adds up more gain.. argh).

But, looking back at the circuit again. There is nothing wrong with
it.. theoritically, right. I was just hoping that i need to play
around more with it.

I was hoping that maybe my connection is loose, or the values are
wrong, rather than my circuit is wrong.

Thanks heaps.


On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:36:21 -0700, Bill & Pookie <reddxEraseMEspam.....comcast.net> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

> {Original Message removed}

2004\10\13@190259 by David Duffy

flavicon
face
Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:

>Hi,
>It's quite true that the transducer is already a bandpass filter. But,
>then again, the filter is just to be safe there. No harm in doing
>that,(except that maybe it adds up more gain.. argh).
>
>But, looking back at the circuit again. There is nothing wrong with
>it.. theoritically, right. I was just hoping that i need to play
>around more with it.
>
>I was hoping that maybe my connection is loose, or the values are
>wrong, rather than my circuit is wrong.
>  
>

The 100pF is too small for the 10K resistor. Someone else told you it
has a reatance of 40K at 40Khz so that alone means a 75% reduction
at 40KHz for each pole. Change it to 1000pF and see the difference.
David...
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@191619 by Dave VanHorn

flavicon
face

>
>But, looking back at the circuit again. There is nothing wrong with
>it.. theoritically, right. I was just hoping that i need to play
>around more with it.

Simulation and real life don't always agree.

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@192527 by Richard.Prosser

flavicon
face

To state the obvious - Power supply ON.?

And how are the DC voltages around the circuit? Are they as expected or
jammed against one or the other rails?

RP



Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:

{Quote hidden}

The 100pF is too small for the 10K resistor. Someone else told you it
has a reatance of 40K at 40Khz so that alone means a 75% reduction
at 40KHz for each pole. Change it to 1000pF and see the difference.
David...
_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist




_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@193900 by Dave VanHorn

flavicon
face
At 07:24 PM 10/13/2004, EraseMERichard.Prosserspampowerware.com wrote:


>To state the obvious - Power supply ON.?
>
>And how are the DC voltages around the circuit? Are they as expected or
>jammed against one or the other rails?

When a prototype doesn't work, there are only three possibilities:

1: It's designed wrong. Check your assumptions and math.
2: It's built wrong. Check your connections and voltages.
3: It's actually working, check your test setup.


_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\13@202753 by n Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar

picon face
Hi guys,
Thanks so much for all the input.

I have checked my circuit, and just found one silly mistake.
The Channel 2 on the CRO is not working. When i test to look at the DC
output of my power supply, there were just some bunch of junk.
Damn the CRO.

Now, my circuit works great.

And the 1000pF works great.

Thanks.



On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:39:16 -0500, Dave VanHorn <RemoveMEdvanhornEraseMEspamEraseMEdvanhorn.org> wrote:
{Quote hidden}

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\14@043941 by vze27bym

picon face
1M resistor multiplied by input current may create
significant output offset as well.
T resistor network in negative feedback might help.
( instead of 1000:10 in two stages 100:10 by 100:10 )

WBR Dmitry.



Wan Zulhelmi Wan Ahmad Kamar wrote:
{Quote hidden}

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

2004\10\14@084821 by Robin.Bussell
flavicon
face


>Simulation and real life don't always agree.

or more memorably:

" In theory, theory and practice are the same.
  In practice they're different "


Cheers,
           Robin.






This email originates from AXA Sun Life Services Plc (reg. no. 3424940) which is a service company for the following companies within the AXA UK plc Group:
AXA Sun Life Plc (reg. no. 3291349)
Sun Life Assurance Society Plc (reg. no. 776273)
Sun Life Unit Assurance Limited (reg. no. 975601)
Sun Life Pensions Management Limited (reg. no. 1105141)
AXA Equity & Law Life Assurance Society Plc (reg. no. 575435)

All of the above mentioned companies are registered in England and have their registered office at 107 Cheapside, London EC2V 6DU, England.

This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If you have received this in error, you should not disseminate or copy this email.  Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system.  

Please also note that any opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The AXA UK Plc Group.

Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure, or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, late in arriving or incomplete as a result of the transmission process.  The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of email transmission.

Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for viruses.  The AXA UK Plc Group accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.

_______________________________________________
http://www.piclist.com
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2004 , 2005 only
- Today
- New search...