Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[EE]: VHDL Compiler'
2002\10\15@173202
by
Digiled dot com
2002\10\15@174002
by
Herbert Graf
> Hello pic,
>
> Anyone can recomend me a good VHDL Compiler ?
> Should I begin with VHDL or Verilog ?
> Hearing advices... regards, Gus
What devices will you be using, or do you just want to experiment? If so go
to http://www.xilinx.com, they offer a free IDE that supports verilog and VHDL
IIRC. It is pretty much the same tool as the one they sell for hundreds of
dollars. TTYL
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The list server can filter out subtopics
(like ads or off topics) for you. See http://www.piclist.com/#topics
2002\10\16@084525
by
Al Williams
2002\10\16@215040
by
Brendan Moran
At 05:39 PM 15/10/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > Hello pic,
> >
> > Anyone can recomend me a good VHDL Compiler ?
> > Should I begin with VHDL or Verilog ?
> > Hearing advices... regards, Gus
I've heard tell, though I'm not sure how accurate this is, that Verilog
yields better results than VHDL.
--Brendan
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
2002\10\16@221935
by
Herbert Graf
> At 05:39 PM 15/10/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > > Hello pic,
> > >
> > > Anyone can recomend me a good VHDL Compiler ?
> > > Should I begin with VHDL or Verilog ?
> > > Hearing advices... regards, Gus
>
> I've heard tell, though I'm not sure how accurate this is, that Verilog
> yields better results than VHDL.
I would think that Verilog might be more "forgiving" but I don't really
think it could consistantly yield "better" results. TTYL
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
2002\10\16@225233
by
Brendan Moran
|
> > I've heard tell, though I'm not sure how accurate this is, that Verilog
> > yields better results than VHDL.
>
> I would think that Verilog might be more "forgiving" but I don't
> really
>think it could consistantly yield "better" results. TTYL
Personally, my only experience is with VHDL, and I have not tried Verilog
Warp, made by Cypress, is the compiler I've used, but that doesn't do much
for someone designing for Xilinx or aAmel, etc. The OP should decide what
part he is designing for before looking at what compiler to use. I think
that Xilinx has a fair number of free tools, though.
I, personally, have very little opinion on which is better. (Verilog vs. VHDL)
What I said, quoted above, comes from having read the results of a contest
in '99. The overview can be found here:
http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~gerard/Teach/Verilog/manual/Example/lrgeEx2/cooley.html?http://oldeee.see.ed.ac.uk/~gerard/Teach/Verilog/manual/Example/lrgeEx2/cooley.html
The part I'm refering to is this: "reported that 8 out of the 9 Verilog
designers managed to complete the conference's design contest yet *none* of
the 5 VHDL designers could."
However, he later stated "I'm going present *everything* that happened at
the Design Contest, warts and all, and let *you* judge! At the end of court
evidence, I'll ask you, the jury, to write an e-mail reply which I can
publish in my column in the follow-up "Integrated System Design""
Before coming up with theories on how that could have happened, please do
read the article from the link seen above.
The conclusion that I drew from this is that the Verilog language may be
slightly friendlier. That *does* lead to better results via less
frustrated designers, who usually tend to think more clearly.
--Brendan
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
2002\10\16@230918
by
Herbert Graf
|
> > I would think that Verilog might be more "forgiving" but I don't
> > really
> >think it could consistantly yield "better" results. TTYL
> I, personally, have very little opinion on which is better.
> (Verilog vs. VHDL)
>
> The conclusion that I drew from this is that the Verilog language may be
> slightly friendlier. That *does* lead to better results via less
> frustrated designers, who usually tend to think more clearly.
Interesting link, personally I feel Verilog is more "natural" for a person
coming from a computer programming background (which is most students these
days). Verilog tends to "flow" more like a HLL then VHDL. With that said it
also has the disadvantage of the user "forgetting" they are using a HDL and
NOT a computer language which can lead to completely normal looking code
that doesn't function (ask me how I know...). However, the same mistakes can
be made with VHDL. FWIW I've been exposed to VHDL (at school) but have used
Verilog exclusively (through my job) and although I perhaps should give VHDL
another try I much prefer Verilog, at the moment. TTYL
--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways. See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.
2002\10\17@155429
by
Peter L. Peres
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2002
, 2003 only
- Today
- New search...