Exact match. Not showing close matches.
'[EE]: Opinions spought on Electrostatic'
|At 05:46 PM 1/12/01 +1300, Russell McMahon wrote:
>I'd be interested in opinions (backed by any available hard data) on what
>constitutes an adequate dissipative surface for a storage container used for
>The resultant finish produces a resistance of around 200 megohms (!!!)
>across a 1cm distance using standard meter test probes touching the surface.
>(The resistance seems to increase roughly linearly with separation) .
>Is this very high resistance considered adequate for electrostatic
It sounds like it will make an *excellent* dissipative surface. I'd have
to go back and hit the books the ESD auditor left behind, but as I recall,
10e7 thru 10e9 ohms per square is considered to be dissipative.
You want the surface resistance to be so high as to not cause a high
current if a spark does occur from a charged object (or person) touching
the surface, yet low enough that the charge dissipates quickly. Your 200
Mohms should be right in there.
What is the brand name and part number of the conductive liquid? How much
did you dilute it and with what?
Dwayne Reid <planet.eon.net> dwayner
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax
Celebrating 17 years of Engineering Innovation (1984 - 2001)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Do NOT send unsolicited commercial email to this email address.
This message neither grants consent to receive unsolicited
commercial email nor is intended to solicit commercial email.
http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2001
, 2002 only
- New search...