Searching \ for '[EE],[OT]: Input impedance matching [Admin note]' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/ios.htm?key=input
Search entire site for: ',[OT]: Input impedance matching [Admin note]'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[EE],[OT]: Input impedance matching [Admin note]'
2000\07\03@153533 by Mark Willis

flavicon
face
(Admin note - for multiple Subject Tags, you want
[first],[second],[third]: i.e. [EE],[OT]: for this post - we'll get used
to it <G>)

 Mark

--
http://www.piclist.com hint: The PICList is archived three different
ways.  See http://www.piclist.com/#archives for details.

2000\07\03@205000 by Russell McMahon

picon face
Does -

[1st]: [2nd]: [3rd]:

also work?

If not, which if either of the tags are valid (or is this too hard ;-) ?


RM


{Original Message removed}

2000\07\03@205000 by Russell McMahon

picon face
Does -

[1st]: [2nd]: [3rd]:

also work?

If not, which if either of the tags are valid (or is this too hard ;-) ?


RM


{Original Message removed}

2000\07\05@134516 by Mark Willis

flavicon
face
I *think* just the first is paid attention to by the list engine - If I
had source code I could tell you, I think the real way to tell is for
someone to subscribe 2 acc't to the list, and set each one to only take
in one of {[AD],[OT]} then send a test message with [ot]: [ad]: in the
headers and see which of the two acc'ts gets it (Those 2 should be the
least bothersome tags as anyone choosing to get 'em shouldn't gripe
about one test.)  The manual strongly implies that [OT],[AD]: is "the
one true way" - but I believe in source code, not documentation, and
barring that testing actual behavior is a GOOD idea <G>

I haven't the time right now tho, need to fix this place (Water system
broke last night, it's almost fixed but I'd really like it DONE - This
place is running out of things I haven't fixed yet, almost <G>)

 Mark

Russell McMahon wrote:
> Does -
>
> [1st]: [2nd]: [3rd]:
>
> also work?
>
> If not, which if either of the tags are valid (or is this too hard ;-) ?
>
> RM
>
> {Original Message removed}

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000 , 2001 only
- Today
- New search...