Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[EE],[OT]: Input impedance matching [Admin note]'
2000\07\03@153533
by
Mark Willis
2000\07\03@205000
by
Russell McMahon
Does -
[1st]: [2nd]: [3rd]:
also work?
If not, which if either of the tags are valid (or is this too hard ;-) ?
RM
{Original Message removed}
2000\07\03@205000
by
Russell McMahon
Does -
[1st]: [2nd]: [3rd]:
also work?
If not, which if either of the tags are valid (or is this too hard ;-) ?
RM
{Original Message removed}
2000\07\05@134516
by
Mark Willis
|
I *think* just the first is paid attention to by the list engine - If I
had source code I could tell you, I think the real way to tell is for
someone to subscribe 2 acc't to the list, and set each one to only take
in one of {[AD],[OT]} then send a test message with [ot]: [ad]: in the
headers and see which of the two acc'ts gets it (Those 2 should be the
least bothersome tags as anyone choosing to get 'em shouldn't gripe
about one test.) The manual strongly implies that [OT],[AD]: is "the
one true way" - but I believe in source code, not documentation, and
barring that testing actual behavior is a GOOD idea <G>
I haven't the time right now tho, need to fix this place (Water system
broke last night, it's almost fixed but I'd really like it DONE - This
place is running out of things I haven't fixed yet, almost <G>)
Mark
Russell McMahon wrote:
> Does -
>
> [1st]: [2nd]: [3rd]:
>
> also work?
>
> If not, which if either of the tags are valid (or is this too hard ;-) ?
>
> RM
>
> {Original Message removed}
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000
, 2001 only
- Today
- New search...