Searching \ for '[ADMIN] Did the filtering scheme get abandoned?' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/logic/dsps.htm?key=filter
Search entire site for: 'Did the filtering scheme get abandoned?'.

Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList Thread
'[ADMIN] Did the filtering scheme get abandoned?'
2000\05\30@122047 by Don B. Roadman

flavicon
face
I'm still getting some posts marked [OT] after I used the new
commands to reject these posts. I'm wondering if it was
abandoned, or if I did something wrong. I did get a response from
the server indicating that the removal of [OT] was sucessfull, but
still get them (I dont know if I get all of them or not).

2000\05\30@140636 by Mark Willis

flavicon
face
We are working on it - I was going to get a post out but got swamped
this weekend.

The problem that happens is that senders MUST send a post with "[OT]:"
for the filter to work properly - if that colon is not there, it's
classified as an "Other" category post.  Send the output of "Query
PICList" my way if you don't see how to turn off the other category (of
course, if you do that, you'll lose any post from someone who's not
properly setting theit topic - This post included!)

We need more education on the list, I need to get on it.

 Mark

Don B. Roadman wrote:
>
> I'm still getting some posts marked [OT] after I used the new
> commands to reject these posts. I'm wondering if it was
> abandoned, or if I did something wrong. I did get a response from
> the server indicating that the removal of [OT] was sucessfull, but
> still get them (I dont know if I get all of them or not).

--
I re-ship for small US & overseas businesses, world-wide.
(For private individuals at cost; ask.)

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2000 , 2001 only
- Today
- New search...