Searching \ for '(Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: Bit Number to Bit Ma' in subject line. ()
Make payments with PayPal - it's fast, free and secure! Help us get a faster server
FAQ page: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=bit+number+bit+FWD%5D
Search entire site for: 'Re: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: Bit Number to Bit Ma'.

Truncated match.
PICList Thread
'(Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: Bit Number to Bit Ma'
1997\09\17@223227 by Andrew Warren

face
flavicon
face
   Sigh... Yet another one.  I guess I'll have to remove the
   "Reply-To" header from my outgoing e-mail.

   -Andy

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------

From:          John Payson <spam_OUTsupercatTakeThisOuTspamMcs.Net>
Subject:       Re: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd) Re: Bit Number to Bit Mask Question
To:            .....fastfwdKILLspamspam@spam@ix.netcom.com
Date:          Wed, 17 Sep 1997 20:53:18 -0500 (CDT)


{Quote hidden}

Ah... good way to do the conditional shift without worrying about
carry flag. Cool.
>
>  btfsc  BITNUM,2
>  swapf  temp,f
>
>  movfw  temp
>
> ;       9 words / 9 cycles

That's a savings.  Probably makes it as good as the table for many
app- lications.

{Quote hidden}

Okay, the SUBLW seems to have been the trick I was looking for.

> > Interesting, but even worse (unless I'm missing an optimization on
> > that ending part).  Anyone see any improvements for those two methods
> > above?

> The first code looks better .

I guess, it does seem to be a word shorter/cycle faster.  Though
there's something I like aesthetically about the second... I'll just
have to find a way to rid of those 4 annoying cycles (and the use of
TEMP)...

------- End of Forwarded Message -------

1997\09\18@004346 by mikesmith_oz.nosp*m

flavicon
face
On 17 Sep 97 at 19:30, Andrew Warren wrote:

>     Sigh... Yet another one.  I guess I'll have to remove the
>     "Reply-To" header from my outgoing e-mail.
>

You sure?  Maybe its another symptom from the problem thats causing
dupes and rejected dupes messages.  Try putting a human-removable but
machine unfriendly section in the reply to - that should prove it.
MikeS
<mikesmith_oz@nosp*m.relaymail.net>
(remove the you know what before replying)

More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 1997 , 1998 only
- Today
- New search...