piclist 2000\11\21\025152a >
Thread: 16C76/CCS vs. 18C252/Hi-Tech
www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=16C
picon face BY : Andy Jancura email (remove spam text)



>Actually, on the 18C you need fn_number*2 for BRA and fn_number*4 for
>GOTO because the 18C uses byte addressed in PCL!
>
>I'd just have the function pointer actually be fn_number*4 and be done
>with it. Of course, we are then limited to 64 functions max that can
>have their addresses taken.
>
>Bob Ammerman


You have right, bytes vs. words again.

Andrej


_____________________________________________________________________________________
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

--
http://www.piclist.com#nomail Going offline? Don't AutoReply us!
email spamBeGonelistservspamspamRemoveMEmitvma.mit.edu with SET PICList DIGEST in the body


<F194GryWtIIZS2TRqf600000703@hotmail.com>

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=16C

Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) 16C76/CCS vs. 18C252/Hi-Tech

month overview.

new search...