piclist 2002\08\25\073039a >
Thread: Wondering about the avr...
face BY : Katinka Mills email (remove spam text)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pic microcontroller discussion list
> [KILLspamPICLISTEraseMEspamspam_OUTMITVMA.MIT.EDU]On Behalf Of Wouter van Ooijen
> Sent: Sunday, 25 August 2002 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [AVR]: Wondering about the avr...
> > An 8MHz AVR is faster than a 20MHz PIC, as the PIC has a /4
> > clock system, so is effectively running at 5MHz. I'd be interested
> > to know if there are any bench mark routine comparisons around
> > of AVR vs PIC for task completion in "real world" applications
> I would guess that the AVR would lead in arithmetic and RAM->RAM
> activities, while the PICs would lead in I/O intesive operations. So you
> should take great care defining a "real world" application, and even
> more care interpreting the results.

Why would you say that AVR is no a leader in I/O intensive operations ?

I have no problems doing most things on an AVR, I actully use an AT90S8515
running at 8Mhz to merge and transmit the merged data stream of DMX 512,
running at 250Kbps.



K.A.Q. Electronics.
Electronic and Software Engineering.
Perth, Western Australia.
Ph +61 (0) 419 923 731

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.384 / Virus Database: 216 - Release Date: 21/08/2002

http://www.piclist.com hint: PICList Posts must start with ONE topic:
[PIC]:,[SX]:,[AVR]: ->uP ONLY! [EE]:,[OT]: ->Other [BUY]:,[AD]: ->Ads

<DLEGKDJAPHEBLGOLCGEMMEBOCFAA.katinka@magestower.com> 7bit

In reply to: <000001c24c26$6dee30b0$0b00a8c0@PAARD>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/index.htm?key=wondering+about
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Wondering about the avr...

month overview.

new search...