piclist 2005\08\18\111916a >
Thread: Alternative to bootloader concept for smaller PICs
face BY : Mike Harrison email (remove spam text)

>> I was thinking particularly about a current design, but it would be applicable to any system where
>> the main application already has :
>> a) An external eprom or serial flash etc. memory big enough to hold a code image
>> b) Some communications link capable of reading/writing to the eeprom.

>If you're going to add an extra chip why not simply add a second PIC and
>use that to program the first in LVP mode? There would be lots of benefits
>in this including the ability to program the config words.

If you read my original post, I said it was applicable to systems where the external EEPROM was
ALREADY present in the product. it would not make sense otherwise.

<0q99g15jvo0i1i4oa9b8uj2oddv102re51@4ax.com> 8bit

In reply to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0508181514170.14569@yoda.srts.co.uk>
See also: www.piclist.com/techref/microchip/devices.htm?key=pic
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) Alternative to bootloader concept for smaller PICs

month overview.

new search...