piclist 2008\07\22\100735a >
Thread: :: He3 fusion power / Lunar Helium
face BY : Apptech email (remove spam text)

>From an Arocket  post

>> So far we haven't got He3 contained fusion, or indeed any
>> form of contained sustained fusion, and He3 is several
>> steps
>> up the hardness ladder from what we will see initially
>> with
>> contained controlled fusion.

> Why?  Specifically, why is fusing He-3 with H-2 any harder
> than fusing H-3
> with H-2?

Far from my specialist topic. But ...
Coz that's what the experts say.
Higher energy levels.
More ..

Artemis project. Excellent You'll be sorry ...



       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_fusion <- not
much use

Almost useful at low technical level


You'll be sorry again ...


This team has one running.
Efficiency is 'a bit low" [tm]


Y don't buy no ugly slideshow (with many "images removed for
copyright reasons" )
FWIW Says reason Chinese want to do lunar access if for He3


<046f01c8ec04$19913470$e701a8c0@y2k> 7bit

See also: www.piclist.com/techref/power.htm?key=power
Reply You must be a member of the piclist mailing list (not only a www.piclist.com member) to post to the piclist. This form requires JavaScript and a browser/email client that can handle form mailto: posts.
Subject (change) :: He3 fusion power / Lunar Helium

month overview.

new search...